A - 113 Assessing the Feasibility of Machine Learning to Predict Frontotemporal Dementia Severity from Neuropsychological Assessments

Abstract Objective To assess the feasibility of utilizing machine learning (ML) of neuropsychological assessment data in determining the severity of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) as classified by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Method A Random Forest classification model was employed using a deidentified FTD dataset. Participants’ (N = 3023) were stratified based on CDR scores for severity: Normal (n = 1646, Mage = 46.95, 59.66% female), Mild (n = 855, Mage = 63.06, 57.08% female), Moderate–Severe (n = 522, Mage = 64.57, 62.45% female). Participants were than randomly stratified into a training set (80%) and a testing set (20%) for model evaluation. The model was then trained on the training set using participant data including age, gender, verbal fluency, digit span forward, digit span backward, trails A, trails B, and the MOCA total score. The model was then evaluated on the testing set. Results The model achieved an accuracy of 74.55% on the testing set. Detailed performance metrics revealed a precision of 86%, recall of 91%, and F1-score of 89% for the normal category, 56% precision, 56% recall, and 56% F1-score for mild, and 65% precision, 52% recall, and 58% F1-score for moderate–severe. The most salient features were verbal fluency and age, with assigned importance scores of 0.174 and 0.150, respectively. Conclusions Although the Random Forest model demonstrated potential in predicting FTD severity from neuropsychological data, its moderate performance for mild and severe categories indicates it’s not yet clinically viable. This study offers a foundational framework, suggesting further model refinement and larger datasets are necessary to enhance accuracy and clinical utility. Future research should focus on including diverse variables and populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.127
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A - 113 Assessing the Feasibility of Machine Learning to Predict Frontotemporal Dementia Severity from Neuropsychological Assessments

Ryan Bennett, Jonathan Brett, Samantha Carrano, Dania Dabbagh
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

A - 113 Assessing the Feasibility of Machine Learning to Predict Frontotemporal Dementia Severity from Neuropsychological Assessments

Ryan Bennett, Jonathan Brett, Samantha Carrano, Dania Dabbagh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To assess the feasibility of utilizing machine learning (ML) of neuropsychological assessment data in determining the severity of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) as classified by the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Method A Random Forest classification model was employed using a deidentified FTD dataset. Participants’ (N = 3023) were stratified based on CDR scores for severity: Normal (n = 1646, Mage = 46.95, 59.66% female), Mild (n = 855, Mage = 63.06, 57.08% female), Moderate–Severe (n = 522, Mage = 64.57, 62.45% female). Participants were than randomly stratified into a training set (80%) and a testing set (20%) for model evaluation. The model was then trained on the training set using participant data including age, gender, verbal fluency, digit span forward, digit span backward, trails A, trails B, and the MOCA total score. The model was then evaluated on the testing set. Results The model achieved an accuracy of 74.55% on the testing set. Detailed performance metrics revealed a precision of 86%, recall of 91%, and F1-score of 89% for the normal category, 56% precision, 56% recall, and 56% F1-score for mild, and 65% precision, 52% recall, and 58% F1-score for moderate–severe. The most salient features were verbal fluency and age, with assigned importance scores of 0.174 and 0.150, respectively. Conclusions Although the Random Forest model demonstrated potential in predicting FTD severity from neuropsychological data, its moderate performance for mild and severe categories indicates it’s not yet clinically viable. This study offers a foundational framework, suggesting further model refinement and larger datasets are necessary to enhance accuracy and clinical utility. Future research should focus on including diverse variables and populations.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.