A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report

Abstract Objective Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive cognitive appraisal towards pain, where exaggerated negative schemas about pain are associated with greater likelihood of pain persisting (Chaves & Brown, 1987). We hypothesized that similar mechanisms might underlie the development of persistent concussion symptoms. We adapted a measure of pain catastrophizing to assess concussion symptom catastrophizing and examined its psychometric properties. Method Participants included 292 youth with diagnosed concussions, 57% female and mean age 14.5 years (SD 1.8) in the Care4Kids national study. First administration (T1) and second administration (T2) were about 1 and 3 months post-injury, respectively. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) – Child version was adapted with concussion symptoms, and named the Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS). Results At T1, the original PCS three-dimension structure (Rumination, Magnification, and Helplessness) was supported with goodness of fit statistic as follows: χ2 (51) = 144.96, p 0.57, p < 0.001). Internal consistency reliability for the CCS Total score was strong (coefficient alpha =0.91). Test–retest reliability over the 2 month period was moderate (r = 0.45), moderated in part due to individual variability in recovery. At T2, significant decreases were found in the Total CCS score. Conclusion(s) Our results indicate preliminary support for the CCS-Child version as a measure of concussion symptoms catastrophizing in pediatric populations. Additional evidence of reliability and validity is needed prior to clinical use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae067.067
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report

Gérard A. Gioia, Sara P. D. Chrisman, Tali Rasooly, Daniel Andre Ignacio et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report

Gérard A. Gioia, Sara P. D. Chrisman, Tali Rasooly, Daniel Andre Ignacio, Talin Babikian, Christopher G. Vaughan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive cognitive appraisal towards pain, where exaggerated negative schemas about pain are associated with greater likelihood of pain persisting (Chaves & Brown, 1987). We hypothesized that similar mechanisms might underlie the development of persistent concussion symptoms. We adapted a measure of pain catastrophizing to assess concussion symptom catastrophizing and examined its psychometric properties. Method Participants included 292 youth with diagnosed concussions, 57% female and mean age 14.5 years (SD 1.8) in the Care4Kids national study. First administration (T1) and second administration (T2) were about 1 and 3 months post-injury, respectively. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) – Child version was adapted with concussion symptoms, and named the Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS). Results At T1, the original PCS three-dimension structure (Rumination, Magnification, and Helplessness) was supported with goodness of fit statistic as follows: χ2 (51) = 144.96, p 0.57, p < 0.001). Internal consistency reliability for the CCS Total score was strong (coefficient alpha =0.91). Test–retest reliability over the 2 month period was moderate (r = 0.45), moderated in part due to individual variability in recovery. At T2, significant decreases were found in the Total CCS score. Conclusion(s) Our results indicate preliminary support for the CCS-Child version as a measure of concussion symptoms catastrophizing in pediatric populations. Additional evidence of reliability and validity is needed prior to clinical use.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A - 53 Preliminary Psychometric Examination of Concussion Catastrophizing Scale (CCS), Self Report — Gérard A. Gioia, Sara P. D. Chrisman, et al. · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS