PSV-12 Evaluating the effect of lyoprotectants in preserving community structure and bacterial viability in the lyophilized fecal community of pigs

Abstract Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) stands as a potential method for enhancing pig health. FMT has progressed from the basic delivery of fresh stool, to lyophilized preparations which is beneficial for sample storage, but can damage bacterial cells. This has necessitated the need for lyoprotectants to preserve bacterial viability. However, the ideal lyoprotectant for retaining community structure and viability remains unclear. Furthermore, DNA-based microbial profiling methods such as 16S rRNA and metagenomics sequencing do not distinguish live and dead bacteria, prompting the need for other methods of distinguishing live and dead members of the bacterial community after lyophilization. PMA-seq (propidium monoazide treatment followed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing) has been shown to differentiate between live and dead bacteria in microbial communities. To refine FMT in pigs, we sought to ascertain the impact of four lyoprotectants on bacterial viability and fecal microbiome structure. Fecal samples from six pigs were treated with mannitol, maltodextrin, trehalose, maltodextrin-trehalose mix (2.5% each) as lyoprotectants or left untreated. Lyophilized fecal samples underwent PMA treatment prior to 16S rRNA sequencing to capture the active community, and total and viable bacterial cells number were quantified. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze total and viable bacterial cells, and richness, while PERMANOVA was used to compare beta diversity. Results revealed no initial differences in total, viable bacteria, or community structure (P > 0.05). However, untreated, and mannitol-treated groups showed significantly reduced total and viable bacterial cells post-lyophilization (P < 0.01), unlike the other lyoprotectants (P > 0.05). Mannitol and the untreated group also displayed decreased richness and beta diversity shifts (P < 0.05). Overall, lyophilization with mannitol or no lyoprotectant notably impacted pig fecal microbiota community structure, while maltodextrin, trehalose, and maltodextrin-trehalose effectively preserved bacterial viability and structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.578
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PSV-12 Evaluating the effect of lyoprotectants in preserving community structure and bacterial viability in the lyophilized fecal community of pigs

Paul Oladele, Timothy A. Johnson
Journal of Animal Science
Gut microbiota and health
article

PSV-12 Evaluating the effect of lyoprotectants in preserving community structure and bacterial viability in the lyophilized fecal community of pigs

Paul Oladele, Timothy A. Johnson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) stands as a potential method for enhancing pig health. FMT has progressed from the basic delivery of fresh stool, to lyophilized preparations which is beneficial for sample storage, but can damage bacterial cells. This has necessitated the need for lyoprotectants to preserve bacterial viability. However, the ideal lyoprotectant for retaining community structure and viability remains unclear. Furthermore, DNA-based microbial profiling methods such as 16S rRNA and metagenomics sequencing do not distinguish live and dead bacteria, prompting the need for other methods of distinguishing live and dead members of the bacterial community after lyophilization. PMA-seq (propidium monoazide treatment followed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing) has been shown to differentiate between live and dead bacteria in microbial communities. To refine FMT in pigs, we sought to ascertain the impact of four lyoprotectants on bacterial viability and fecal microbiome structure. Fecal samples from six pigs were treated with mannitol, maltodextrin, trehalose, maltodextrin-trehalose mix (2.5% each) as lyoprotectants or left untreated. Lyophilized fecal samples underwent PMA treatment prior to 16S rRNA sequencing to capture the active community, and total and viable bacterial cells number were quantified. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze total and viable bacterial cells, and richness, while PERMANOVA was used to compare beta diversity. Results revealed no initial differences in total, viable bacteria, or community structure (P > 0.05). However, untreated, and mannitol-treated groups showed significantly reduced total and viable bacterial cells post-lyophilization (P < 0.01), unlike the other lyoprotectants (P > 0.05). Mannitol and the untreated group also displayed decreased richness and beta diversity shifts (P < 0.05). Overall, lyophilization with mannitol or no lyoprotectant notably impacted pig fecal microbiota community structure, while maltodextrin, trehalose, and maltodextrin-trehalose effectively preserved bacterial viability and structure.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.