175 Corporate drivers of sustainability and implications for the business case to make changes based on sustainability opportunities

Abstract Frequently NGOs, policy organizations, academics and others outside corporate decision-making structures, promote fact-based analyses with the intent of driving change in operations, products and services of businesses. However, there are many other considerations that business leaders weigh before implementing any changes in the name of sustainability. While cost often comes to mind first, fundamentally customer behavior, investor expectations and the ambiguity of potential future risks versus rewards, are crucial. The world of animal agriculture and animal proteins is no exception. While advancing the science of animal protein sustainability is very necessary, practitioners need to have realistic expectations of how, and how quickly, businesses will make changes consistent with science-based arguments. In some extreme cases, companies even take positive actions that they intentionally downplay. Using examples from published analyses, corporate statements and first-hand experience, this presentation will provide insights about the competing influences on food businesses to implement changes intended to improve sustainability of animal agriculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.160
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

175 Corporate drivers of sustainability and implications for the business case to make changes based on sustainability opportunities

David Dayhoff
Journal of Animal Science
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

175 Corporate drivers of sustainability and implications for the business case to make changes based on sustainability opportunities

David Dayhoff
article en

Abstract

Abstract Frequently NGOs, policy organizations, academics and others outside corporate decision-making structures, promote fact-based analyses with the intent of driving change in operations, products and services of businesses. However, there are many other considerations that business leaders weigh before implementing any changes in the name of sustainability. While cost often comes to mind first, fundamentally customer behavior, investor expectations and the ambiguity of potential future risks versus rewards, are crucial. The world of animal agriculture and animal proteins is no exception. While advancing the science of animal protein sustainability is very necessary, practitioners need to have realistic expectations of how, and how quickly, businesses will make changes consistent with science-based arguments. In some extreme cases, companies even take positive actions that they intentionally downplay. Using examples from published analyses, corporate statements and first-hand experience, this presentation will provide insights about the competing influences on food businesses to implement changes intended to improve sustainability of animal agriculture.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
DSM (Netherlands) (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

175 Corporate drivers of sustainability and implications for the business case to make changes based on sustainability opportunities — David Dayhoff · Journal of Animal Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS