PSIX-23 Evaluation of number of goats grazing grass-based pasture for estimation of methane emission using GreenFeed system

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the number of goats in pasture grazing on methane (CH4) emissions estimates using the GreenFeed system (GFS). The study involved growing meat goats, approximately 1.2 yr old and body weight (BW) of 23.9 ± 0.63 kg, over seven 2-wk periods. In periods 1, 2, and 3, 24 goats were used (Treatment 1: G-24), while periods 4 and 5 involved 18 goats (Treatment 2: G-18), and periods 6 and 7 used 12 goats (Treatment 3: G-12). The pasture area was divided into three paddocks for grazing, except during gas measurements in a stationary respiration calorimetry system (SCS) room for 2 d, where goats were fed fresh forage from the same pastureland. The GFS was programmed to dispense pellets and measured gas at specific intervals of the day (i.e., at 0700-0800 h, 1300-1400 h, 1900-2000 h, and 0100-0200 h), provided 120 g/d of concentrate pellets to attract goats for gas measurements. Statistical analysis using mixed model procedures of SAS included SCS data from preceding and succeeding periods as covariates for GFS gas data analysis. Daily dry matter (DM) intake was greater (P < 0.001) in G-12 compared with G-24 and G-18, but when expressed g/kg BW, intakes were similar (P = 0.081) across treatments. Conversely, digested DM and gross energy intakes were greater (P < 0.001) in G-24 than in G-18 and G-12 (494, 509, and 577 g/d and SE = 21.3 and 7.91, 8.10, and 9.20 MJ/d and SE = 0.359 for G-24, G-18, and G-12, respectively). Daily CH4 production was unaffected (P = 0.254) by treatment (26.6, 25.2, and 26.1 g/d; SE = 0.819), despite variations in daily GFS visits by goats (3.26, 2.61, and 2.53 visits/d and SE = 0.106 for G-24, G-18, and G-12, respectively; P < 0.001). However, CH4 emissions in g/kg DM intake or digestible DM intake differed among treatments, with G-18 intermediate between G-24 and G-12 (35.6, 33.4, and 32.0 g/kg DM intake, SE = 1.02, P = 0.024; 54.1, 51.2, and 48.9 g/kg digestible DM intake, SE = 1.71, and P < 0.001 for G-24, G-18, and G-12, respectively). Carbon dioxide production, expressed in g/d and g/kg DM intake, was greater in G-12 and G-18 compared with G-24. Heat production ranked greatest in G-12, followed by G-18 and G-24. Regardless of treatment, CH4 emissions in g/d, g/kg DM intake or g/kg digestible DM intake were greater in GFS than in SCS (25.5 and 9.56 g/d, 33.8 and 14.4 g/kg DM intake, and 51.2 and 23.8 g/kg digestible DM intake for GFS and SCS, respectively; P < 0.001). In conclusion, differences in CH4 emissions in g/kg DM intake and digestible DM intake among treatments suggests that number of animals in grazing pasture may influence CH4 emission estimates in goats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.900
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PSIX-23 Evaluation of number of goats grazing grass-based pasture for estimation of methane emission using GreenFeed system

A.L. Goetsch, Amlan Kumar Patra, R. Puchała, Yirga Y Hirut et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
article

PSIX-23 Evaluation of number of goats grazing grass-based pasture for estimation of methane emission using GreenFeed system

A.L. Goetsch, Amlan Kumar Patra, R. Puchała, Yirga Y Hirut, Dereje T Tadesse
article en

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the number of goats in pasture grazing on methane (CH4) emissions estimates using the GreenFeed system (GFS). The study involved growing meat goats, approximately 1.2 yr old and body weight (BW) of 23.9 ± 0.63 kg, over seven 2-wk periods. In periods 1, 2, and 3, 24 goats were used (Treatment 1: G-24), while periods 4 and 5 involved 18 goats (Treatment 2: G-18), and periods 6 and 7 used 12 goats (Treatment 3: G-12). The pasture area was divided into three paddocks for grazing, except during gas measurements in a stationary respiration calorimetry system (SCS) room for 2 d, where goats were fed fresh forage from the same pastureland. The GFS was programmed to dispense pellets and measured gas at specific intervals of the day (i.e., at 0700-0800 h, 1300-1400 h, 1900-2000 h, and 0100-0200 h), provided 120 g/d of concentrate pellets to attract goats for gas measurements. Statistical analysis using mixed model procedures of SAS included SCS data from preceding and succeeding periods as covariates for GFS gas data analysis. Daily dry matter (DM) intake was greater (P < 0.001) in G-12 compared with G-24 and G-18, but when expressed g/kg BW, intakes were similar (P = 0.081) across treatments. Conversely, digested DM and gross energy intakes were greater (P < 0.001) in G-24 than in G-18 and G-12 (494, 509, and 577 g/d and SE = 21.3 and 7.91, 8.10, and 9.20 MJ/d and SE = 0.359 for G-24, G-18, and G-12, respectively). Daily CH4 production was unaffected (P = 0.254) by treatment (26.6, 25.2, and 26.1 g/d; SE = 0.819), despite variations in daily GFS visits by goats (3.26, 2.61, and 2.53 visits/d and SE = 0.106 for G-24, G-18, and G-12, respectively; P < 0.001). However, CH4 emissions in g/kg DM intake or digestible DM intake differed among treatments, with G-18 intermediate between G-24 and G-12 (35.6, 33.4, and 32.0 g/kg DM intake, SE = 1.02, P = 0.024; 54.1, 51.2, and 48.9 g/kg digestible DM intake, SE = 1.71, and P < 0.001 for G-24, G-18, and G-12, respectively). Carbon dioxide production, expressed in g/d and g/kg DM intake, was greater in G-12 and G-18 compared with G-24. Heat production ranked greatest in G-12, followed by G-18 and G-24. Regardless of treatment, CH4 emissions in g/d, g/kg DM intake or g/kg digestible DM intake were greater in GFS than in SCS (25.5 and 9.56 g/d, 33.8 and 14.4 g/kg DM intake, and 51.2 and 23.8 g/kg digestible DM intake for GFS and SCS, respectively; P < 0.001). In conclusion, differences in CH4 emissions in g/kg DM intake and digestible DM intake among treatments suggests that number of animals in grazing pasture may influence CH4 emission estimates in goats.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
American Institute for Economic Research (US), Langston University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.