183 Comparison of presynchronization and OvSynch protocols following fixed-time breeding in lactating dairy cattle

Abstract Current study was carried out to compare two presynch-OvSynch protocols with standard OvSynch protocol in postpartum Holstein dairy cattle. Postpartum cows (n = 473) were randomly divided into one of the three protocols: I) G7G-OvSynch (n = 159), cows were subjected to PGF2α followed by GnRH 48 h later. After 7 d post-GnRH injection, standard OvSynch protocol was introduced, II) G7GM-OvSynch (n = 162), cows were subjected to the same protocol as in group I) except one extra PGF2α at 12 h interval in Ovsynch part, and III) standard OvSynch protocol (n = 152). The progesterone (P4) profile was subjected to d 30 and d 60 post FTAI. Ovarian status was monitored at the 1st GnRH, PG, and 2nd GnRH injection of the breeding part. Pregnancy/ AI was diagnosed on d 30,60, and 90 post-FTAI, and pregnancy loss was also on d 60 and 90 post-FTAI. Pregnancy data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and plasma P4 profile by ANOVA using SAS. Ovulatory follicle diameter (mean ± SD) was 15.44 ± 1.24 in G7G-Ovsynch, 15.21 ± 1.36 in G7GM-OvSynch, and 14.90 ± 1.02 in OvSynch, respectively (P > 0.05). Plasma P4 profile (ng/mL; Mean ± SD) on d 30 post TAI was 6.50 ± 1.39,7.01 ± 1.13 and in 6.49 ± 1.32 G7G-OvSynch, G7GM-Ovsynch and OvSynch groups, respectively (P = 0.09). On d 60 post TAI, P4 profile was recorded to be 7.75 ± 1.20, 7.58 ± 1.36 and 6.80 ± 0.96 in G7G-OvSynch, G7GM-OvSynch and OvSynch, respectively (P < 0.05). P/AI on d 30 was 51.57% (83/159), 57.41% (93/162) and 42.76% (65/152) G7G-Ovsynch, G7GM-OvSynch, and OvSynch, respectively (P = 0.033). Similarly, AI on d 60 and d 90 post FTAI was 44.65% (1/159):51.85% (84/162), 38.16% (58/152): 43.40% (69/159) and 51.23% (83/162):36.18% (55/152) in G7G-Ovsynch, G7GM-OvSynch, and OvSynch protocols (P = 0.051: 0.027), respectively. Pregnancy loss on d 60 and d 90 post FTAI was 13.41%: 2.90%, 9.68%: 1.20% and 10.77%: 5.20% in G7G-Ovsynch, G7GM-OvSynch, and OvSynch, respectively (P = 0.73: 0.35). Although statistically non-significant (P = 0.56), overall pregnancy loss on d 90 post-FTAI was also numerically greater in the G7G-OvSynch (15.85%) protocol as compared with G7GM-OvSynch (10.75%) and OvSynch (15.38%). We concluded that the G7GM-OvSynch protocol has resulted in an increased P/AI, P4 profile in comparison with G7G-OvSynch and OvSynch. Similarly, pregnancy loss was also less in the G7GM-Ovsynch protocol, which makes it a protocol of choice for postpartum dairy cows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.357
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

183 Comparison of presynchronization and OvSynch protocols following fixed-time breeding in lactating dairy cattle

Irem Anwar, Mazhar Abbas, Ali Abbas, R.S. Blouch et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

183 Comparison of presynchronization and OvSynch protocols following fixed-time breeding in lactating dairy cattle

Irem Anwar, Mazhar Abbas, Ali Abbas, R.S. Blouch, Shaista Abbas, Abid Hussain Shahzad, Sayyed Aun Muhammad
article en

Abstract

Abstract Current study was carried out to compare two presynch-OvSynch protocols with standard OvSynch protocol in postpartum Holstein dairy cattle. Postpartum cows (n = 473) were randomly divided into one of the three protocols: I) G7G-OvSynch (n = 159), cows were subjected to PGF2α followed by GnRH 48 h later. After 7 d post-GnRH injection, standard OvSynch protocol was introduced, II) G7GM-OvSynch (n = 162), cows were subjected to the same protocol as in group I) except one extra PGF2α at 12 h interval in Ovsynch part, and III) standard OvSynch protocol (n = 152). The progesterone (P4) profile was subjected to d 30 and d 60 post FTAI. Ovarian status was monitored at the 1st GnRH, PG, and 2nd GnRH injection of the breeding part. Pregnancy/ AI was diagnosed on d 30,60, and 90 post-FTAI, and pregnancy loss was also on d 60 and 90 post-FTAI. Pregnancy data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and plasma P4 profile by ANOVA using SAS. Ovulatory follicle diameter (mean ± SD) was 15.44 ± 1.24 in G7G-Ovsynch, 15.21 ± 1.36 in G7GM-OvSynch, and 14.90 ± 1.02 in OvSynch, respectively (P > 0.05). Plasma P4 profile (ng/mL; Mean ± SD) on d 30 post TAI was 6.50 ± 1.39,7.01 ± 1.13 and in 6.49 ± 1.32 G7G-OvSynch, G7GM-Ovsynch and OvSynch groups, respectively (P = 0.09). On d 60 post TAI, P4 profile was recorded to be 7.75 ± 1.20, 7.58 ± 1.36 and 6.80 ± 0.96 in G7G-OvSynch, G7GM-OvSynch and OvSynch, respectively (P < 0.05). P/AI on d 30 was 51.57% (83/159), 57.41% (93/162) and 42.76% (65/152) G7G-Ovsynch, G7GM-OvSynch, and OvSynch, respectively (P = 0.033). Similarly, AI on d 60 and d 90 post FTAI was 44.65% (1/159):51.85% (84/162), 38.16% (58/152): 43.40% (69/159) and 51.23% (83/162):36.18% (55/152) in G7G-Ovsynch, G7GM-OvSynch, and OvSynch protocols (P = 0.051: 0.027), respectively. Pregnancy loss on d 60 and d 90 post FTAI was 13.41%: 2.90%, 9.68%: 1.20% and 10.77%: 5.20% in G7G-Ovsynch, G7GM-OvSynch, and OvSynch, respectively (P = 0.73: 0.35). Although statistically non-significant (P = 0.56), overall pregnancy loss on d 90 post-FTAI was also numerically greater in the G7G-OvSynch (15.85%) protocol as compared with G7GM-OvSynch (10.75%) and OvSynch (15.38%). We concluded that the G7GM-OvSynch protocol has resulted in an increased P/AI, P4 profile in comparison with G7G-OvSynch and OvSynch. Similarly, pregnancy loss was also less in the G7GM-Ovsynch protocol, which makes it a protocol of choice for postpartum dairy cows.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
Dairy Australia (Australia) (AU), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.