PSVI-5 Bacteriophage biocontrol of avian pathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> in laying hens does not produce collateral effects on the cecal microbiota

Abstract Bacteriophages have shown promise as an alternative to antibiotics for managing or preventing avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) in the egg industry. In a previous study, a phage cocktail comprising 3 virulent phages was shown to prevent APEC infections in laying hens. The aim of this study was to investigate whether orally and intramuscularly administered phages affect the intestinal barrier function of chickens, with a focus on cecal microbiome. In a 4-d trial, a total of 35 laying hens were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: 1) Medium control group (bacterial broth + phage buffer), 2) APEC only control (APEC + buffer); 3) IM group (Phage +APEC), or 4) DW group (phage in drinking water (4 d prior to APEC + APEC). Cecum samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing targeting the V4 region to assess the effects of phages on cecal bacterial diversity. A 1-way ANOVA was used to evaluate alpha diversity with respect to treatment and time. Microbial community structure was analyzed using β-dispersion and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) to determine the effect of each treatment. Significant (P &amp;lt; 0.05) differentially abundant genera were identified with DESeq2 by fitting a negative binomial model to each treatment vs treatment comparison (“~Treatment”). Across the treatment and control groups, 13 phyla were identified. Firmicutes (53.81%), Bacteroidota (23.83%), Actinobacteriota (1.84%), and Proteobacteria (1.02%) were the most abundant phyla among the amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), with 18.39% being unclassified. Neither richness (P = 0.448) nor Shannon diversity (P = 0.687) exhibited significance in α- diversity metric between treatment and control groups. β-dispersion analysis showed no significant difference (P = 0.239) between treatment and control groups, indicating similar bacterial variability among groups. Moreover, the β-diversity representing microbiota structure was not affected by any phage treatment (P = 0.083). In each treatment group, 76 unique genera were identified, with Megamonas (15.80 %), Lactobacillus (8.76%), Faecalibacterium (7.70 %), Megasphaera (1.58%), Alloprevotella (1.54%), [Ruminococcus] torques group (1.29%), Prevotellaceae UCG-001 (1.14%), Bifidobacterium (1.04%), and Olsenella (0.48%) being the most abundant. Notably, Lactobacillus was more abundant (~ 10 to 20%) in medium control group compared with phage treated and APEC only treatment groups. Furthermore, gene expression profiles of various genera (pairwise) were analyzed using log2 fold change (log2FC), revealing differences (P &amp;lt; 0.05) between control and treatment groups for a total of 58 genera. It was concluded that bacteriophage selectively killed APEC population without comprising the population and structure of cecal microbiome in laying hens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.600
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PSVI-5 Bacteriophage biocontrol of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in laying hens does not produce collateral effects on the cecal microbiota

Mawra Gohar, Faizal Abdul Careem, Nabiha Mehina, Dongyan Xu Niu et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

PSVI-5 Bacteriophage biocontrol of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in laying hens does not produce collateral effects on the cecal microbiota

Mawra Gohar, Faizal Abdul Careem, Nabiha Mehina, Dongyan Xu Niu, Trevor W. Alexander, Matthew Waldner, John M. Fairbrother, C. M. Nyachoti, Jenny Hyun, Riley Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract Bacteriophages have shown promise as an alternative to antibiotics for managing or preventing avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) in the egg industry. In a previous study, a phage cocktail comprising 3 virulent phages was shown to prevent APEC infections in laying hens. The aim of this study was to investigate whether orally and intramuscularly administered phages affect the intestinal barrier function of chickens, with a focus on cecal microbiome. In a 4-d trial, a total of 35 laying hens were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: 1) Medium control group (bacterial broth + phage buffer), 2) APEC only control (APEC + buffer); 3) IM group (Phage +APEC), or 4) DW group (phage in drinking water (4 d prior to APEC + APEC). Cecum samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing targeting the V4 region to assess the effects of phages on cecal bacterial diversity. A 1-way ANOVA was used to evaluate alpha diversity with respect to treatment and time. Microbial community structure was analyzed using β-dispersion and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) to determine the effect of each treatment. Significant (P &amp;lt; 0.05) differentially abundant genera were identified with DESeq2 by fitting a negative binomial model to each treatment vs treatment comparison (“~Treatment”). Across the treatment and control groups, 13 phyla were identified. Firmicutes (53.81%), Bacteroidota (23.83%), Actinobacteriota (1.84%), and Proteobacteria (1.02%) were the most abundant phyla among the amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), with 18.39% being unclassified. Neither richness (P = 0.448) nor Shannon diversity (P = 0.687) exhibited significance in α- diversity metric between treatment and control groups. β-dispersion analysis showed no significant difference (P = 0.239) between treatment and control groups, indicating similar bacterial variability among groups. Moreover, the β-diversity representing microbiota structure was not affected by any phage treatment (P = 0.083). In each treatment group, 76 unique genera were identified, with Megamonas (15.80 %), Lactobacillus (8.76%), Faecalibacterium (7.70 %), Megasphaera (1.58%), Alloprevotella (1.54%), [Ruminococcus] torques group (1.29%), Prevotellaceae UCG-001 (1.14%), Bifidobacterium (1.04%), and Olsenella (0.48%) being the most abundant. Notably, Lactobacillus was more abundant (~ 10 to 20%) in medium control group compared with phage treated and APEC only treatment groups. Furthermore, gene expression profiles of various genera (pairwise) were analyzed using log2 fold change (log2FC), revealing differences (P &amp;lt; 0.05) between control and treatment groups for a total of 58 genera. It was concluded that bacteriophage selectively killed APEC population without comprising the population and structure of cecal microbiome in laying hens.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Manitoba (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.