194 Evaluation of a method to optimize diets of individual dairy cows to maximize income over feed cost

Abstract Recent optimization methods have demonstrated the potential to maximize marginal profits in beef (Marques et al., 2020) and dairy (Campos et al., 2023) by optimizing diet formulation. These methods present an opportunity to explore how diets could be optimized for individual dairy cows, such as in a closed-loop precision feeding system. Therefore, our objectives were to 1) compare individual income over feed costs (IOFC), calculated with observed dry matter intake (DMI), milk yield (MY), milk protein and milk fat, with a predicted IOFC for the same diet and cows using the NASEM (2021) model, and 2) optimize the inclusion rate of ingredients in the diet to maximize predicted IOFC. Previously, 20 multiparous (lactation 2 through 4) and 9 primiparous cows, ranging from 22 to 472 d in milk (DIM), were housed in a free-stall pen at the Ontario Dairy Research Centre (Canada) equipped with sensors to record DMI, body weight (BW; walk-over-weight) and body condition score (BCS; DeLavel 3D camera), in addition to daily MY, weekly milk component tests, and 4 X/d respiratory gas exchange measurements (GreenFeed, C-Lock Inc, USA) for estimation of daily energy flows (Kedzierski, 2020). Weekly means for each cow were used to evaluate IOFC in this study (n = 116). Each IOFC was calculated as milk revenue minus total feed cost. Milk revenue was calculated from milk fat, protein and other solids, consistent with pricing on Canadian dairy farms. The observed IOFC was calculated using the observed MY, milk components and DMI, and the same diet formulation and costs for all cows, whereas the predicted IOFC estimated these values using the NASEM (2021) model with all available observed animal inputs (e.g., BW, BCS, DIM). However, the observed DMI and MY had to be provided initially for the model, as the DMI prediction equation requires a target MY, but the prediction of MY requires DMI. Final predicted DMI and MY values were used in the calculation of predicted IOFC. The differential evolution algorithm from the ‘SciPy’ package (v 1.11.4) in python (v 3.12.0) was used to maximize IOFC by adjusting the inclusion of wheat straw, alfalfa silage, corn silage and high moisture corn grain, while fixing minerals to their original proportions. Overall, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) indicated moderate agreement (0.62) between the predicted IOFC and observed IOFC and good agreement (0.99) between the predicted IOFC and the optimized IOFC, suggesting the optimization method was able to select diets to meet a similar objective. Results indicate that a strategy is needed to minimize the residual error between predicted and observed values for individual cows, such as algebraic reparameterization of the NASEM model, before using an optimization method to automatically formulate diets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.401
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

194 Evaluation of a method to optimize diets of individual dairy cows to maximize income over feed cost

David Innes, Patty Kedzierski, Braeden Fieguth, John Cant
Journal of Animal Science
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
article

194 Evaluation of a method to optimize diets of individual dairy cows to maximize income over feed cost

David Innes, Patty Kedzierski, Braeden Fieguth, John Cant
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent optimization methods have demonstrated the potential to maximize marginal profits in beef (Marques et al., 2020) and dairy (Campos et al., 2023) by optimizing diet formulation. These methods present an opportunity to explore how diets could be optimized for individual dairy cows, such as in a closed-loop precision feeding system. Therefore, our objectives were to 1) compare individual income over feed costs (IOFC), calculated with observed dry matter intake (DMI), milk yield (MY), milk protein and milk fat, with a predicted IOFC for the same diet and cows using the NASEM (2021) model, and 2) optimize the inclusion rate of ingredients in the diet to maximize predicted IOFC. Previously, 20 multiparous (lactation 2 through 4) and 9 primiparous cows, ranging from 22 to 472 d in milk (DIM), were housed in a free-stall pen at the Ontario Dairy Research Centre (Canada) equipped with sensors to record DMI, body weight (BW; walk-over-weight) and body condition score (BCS; DeLavel 3D camera), in addition to daily MY, weekly milk component tests, and 4 X/d respiratory gas exchange measurements (GreenFeed, C-Lock Inc, USA) for estimation of daily energy flows (Kedzierski, 2020). Weekly means for each cow were used to evaluate IOFC in this study (n = 116). Each IOFC was calculated as milk revenue minus total feed cost. Milk revenue was calculated from milk fat, protein and other solids, consistent with pricing on Canadian dairy farms. The observed IOFC was calculated using the observed MY, milk components and DMI, and the same diet formulation and costs for all cows, whereas the predicted IOFC estimated these values using the NASEM (2021) model with all available observed animal inputs (e.g., BW, BCS, DIM). However, the observed DMI and MY had to be provided initially for the model, as the DMI prediction equation requires a target MY, but the prediction of MY requires DMI. Final predicted DMI and MY values were used in the calculation of predicted IOFC. The differential evolution algorithm from the ‘SciPy’ package (v 1.11.4) in python (v 3.12.0) was used to maximize IOFC by adjusting the inclusion of wheat straw, alfalfa silage, corn silage and high moisture corn grain, while fixing minerals to their original proportions. Overall, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) indicated moderate agreement (0.62) between the predicted IOFC and observed IOFC and good agreement (0.99) between the predicted IOFC and the optimized IOFC, suggesting the optimization method was able to select diets to meet a similar objective. Results indicate that a strategy is needed to minimize the residual error between predicted and observed values for individual cows, such as algebraic reparameterization of the NASEM model, before using an optimization method to automatically formulate diets.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.