Mechanics- and Behavior-Related Temporomandibular Joint Differences

Fatigue of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) tissues reflects the effects of magnitude (energy density; ED) and frequency of loading (jaw muscle duty factor; DF). This observational study measured these variables and tested for differences in mechanobehavior scores (MBS = ED<sup>2</sup> × DF) and component variables in subjects with and without TMJ disc displacement (±D). In accordance with Institutional Review Board and STROBE guidelines, written informed consent was obtained, and examination and imaging protocols identified eligible adult subjects. Specifically, magnetic resonance imaging was used to assign subjects' TMJs to ±D groups. Subjects were trained to record in-field jaw muscle activities, from which DFs (percentage of recording time) were determined. EDs (mJ/mm<sup>3</sup>) were estimated using modeled TMJ loads and in vivo dynamic stereometry. Multivariate analysis of variance, post hoc independent <i>t</i> tests, and K-means cluster analysis identified significant group differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Of 242 individuals screened, 65 females (TMJs: 78 +D, 52 -D) and 53 males (TMJs: 39 +D, 67 -D) participated. Subjects produced 312 daytime and 319 nighttime recordings of average duration 6.0 ± 0.2 h and 7.6 ± 0.1 h, respectively, and 219 (114 right, 105 left) intact dynamic stereometry recordings. Average EDs were 2-fold and significantly larger in +D than -D TMJs (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). DFs were on average 3-fold larger during the daytime versus nighttime for both masseter and temporalis muscles and 1.8- and 3.0-fold larger for the masseter versus temporalis muscle during the daytime and nighttime, respectively. Daytime masseter MBSs for +D TMJs in females were the largest overall at 621 ± 212 (mJ/mm<sup>3</sup>)<sup>2</sup>% and 2- to 43-fold larger versus -D TMJs in both sexes during daytime and nighttime. Cluster analysis (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) identified groups 2 and 3, which comprised 87% +D TMJs and had average MBSs 21-fold larger than group 1. The results show MBS as a potential biomarker to predict homeostasis versus progression or reversal of degenerative TMJ structural changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dental Research
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345241265670
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanics- and Behavior-Related Temporomandibular Joint Differences

H. Liu, Laura R. Iwasaki, Jeffrey C. Nickel, Luigi M. Gallo et al.
8 citations
Journal of Dental Research
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
4.04
article

Mechanics- and Behavior-Related Temporomandibular Joint Differences

H. Liu, Laura R. Iwasaki, Jeffrey C. Nickel, Luigi M. Gallo, Yoly González, Ying Liu
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Fatigue of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) tissues reflects the effects of magnitude (energy density; ED) and frequency of loading (jaw muscle duty factor; DF). This observational study measured these variables and tested for differences in mechanobehavior scores (MBS = ED<sup>2</sup> × DF) and component variables in subjects with and without TMJ disc displacement (±D). In accordance with Institutional Review Board and STROBE guidelines, written informed consent was obtained, and examination and imaging protocols identified eligible adult subjects. Specifically, magnetic resonance imaging was used to assign subjects' TMJs to ±D groups. Subjects were trained to record in-field jaw muscle activities, from which DFs (percentage of recording time) were determined. EDs (mJ/mm<sup>3</sup>) were estimated using modeled TMJ loads and in vivo dynamic stereometry. Multivariate analysis of variance, post hoc independent <i>t</i> tests, and K-means cluster analysis identified significant group differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Of 242 individuals screened, 65 females (TMJs: 78 +D, 52 -D) and 53 males (TMJs: 39 +D, 67 -D) participated. Subjects produced 312 daytime and 319 nighttime recordings of average duration 6.0 ± 0.2 h and 7.6 ± 0.1 h, respectively, and 219 (114 right, 105 left) intact dynamic stereometry recordings. Average EDs were 2-fold and significantly larger in +D than -D TMJs (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). DFs were on average 3-fold larger during the daytime versus nighttime for both masseter and temporalis muscles and 1.8- and 3.0-fold larger for the masseter versus temporalis muscle during the daytime and nighttime, respectively. Daytime masseter MBSs for +D TMJs in females were the largest overall at 621 ± 212 (mJ/mm<sup>3</sup>)<sup>2</sup>% and 2- to 43-fold larger versus -D TMJs in both sexes during daytime and nighttime. Cluster analysis (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) identified groups 2 and 3, which comprised 87% +D TMJs and had average MBSs 21-fold larger than group 1. The results show MBS as a potential biomarker to predict homeostasis versus progression or reversal of degenerative TMJ structural changes.

Journal of Dental ResearchVol. 103(11)
East Tennessee State University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
4.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.