277 Estimating the potential effect of <i>Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae</i> infection on swine sustainability

Abstract Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is the primary causative agent of enzootic pneumonia, one of the most common bacterial pathogens affecting pigs and the main contributor to respiratory comorbidities. Infection with M. hyopneumoniae, commonly observed in growing pigs, results in decreased feed intake and an increase in the number of days to reach market weight. Based on extended days to market, pigs infected with M. hyopneumoniae will have a greater life cycle carbon emissions and water usage than that of non-infected pigs. However, the magnitude of additional carbon footprint and water use in pigs infected with M. hyopneumoniae has never been calculated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the potential variation in carbon emissions and water footprint generated by M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs. This study was conducted using data from previous publications on M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs in experimental and commercial conditions. The carbon footprint and water usage of pork production was obtained from the literature and was used as a baseline (3,470 kg of CO2 eq and 1,678 m3 water eq; both per 1,000 kg of pork carcass weight). The change in average daily gain was estimated and additional days on feed to reach market weight were used to calculate potential carbon and water impact for pigs infected with M. hyopneumoniae. The estimated carbon emissions and water usage of M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs increased in a range of 84.69 to 142.93 kg of CO2 eq/1,000 kg of pork carcass weight and 40.95 to 69.12 m3 eq/1,000 kg of pork carcass weight respectively, compared with the carbon emissions of non-infected pigs (Table 1). Results of this study showed an increased carbon footprint for M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs by 2 to 4% and water usage increased by 2.5 to 4.1% suggesting that the sustainability of pork production was negatively affected by this bacterial infection. Previous literature on the impact of controlling vaccine-preventable diseases has shown similar results for other swine respiratory pathogens. In addition, these data only included M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs, thus the effect of respiratory co-infections was not estimated and the impact on sustainability metrics may be greater than currently calculated. The application of sustainable practices in animal production, including disease prevention, is key to ensuring a secure food supply for future generations. The carbon and water footprints of swine production are measurements of sustainability, with average daily gain being an important factor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.058
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

277 Estimating the potential effect of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection on swine sustainability

Maria Pieters, Pedro E Urriola, Mark S. Schwartz, Shelby Krebs
1 links
Journal of Animal Science
Microbial infections and disease research
article

277 Estimating the potential effect of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection on swine sustainability

Maria Pieters, Pedro E Urriola, Mark S. Schwartz, Shelby Krebs
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is the primary causative agent of enzootic pneumonia, one of the most common bacterial pathogens affecting pigs and the main contributor to respiratory comorbidities. Infection with M. hyopneumoniae, commonly observed in growing pigs, results in decreased feed intake and an increase in the number of days to reach market weight. Based on extended days to market, pigs infected with M. hyopneumoniae will have a greater life cycle carbon emissions and water usage than that of non-infected pigs. However, the magnitude of additional carbon footprint and water use in pigs infected with M. hyopneumoniae has never been calculated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the potential variation in carbon emissions and water footprint generated by M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs. This study was conducted using data from previous publications on M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs in experimental and commercial conditions. The carbon footprint and water usage of pork production was obtained from the literature and was used as a baseline (3,470 kg of CO2 eq and 1,678 m3 water eq; both per 1,000 kg of pork carcass weight). The change in average daily gain was estimated and additional days on feed to reach market weight were used to calculate potential carbon and water impact for pigs infected with M. hyopneumoniae. The estimated carbon emissions and water usage of M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs increased in a range of 84.69 to 142.93 kg of CO2 eq/1,000 kg of pork carcass weight and 40.95 to 69.12 m3 eq/1,000 kg of pork carcass weight respectively, compared with the carbon emissions of non-infected pigs (Table 1). Results of this study showed an increased carbon footprint for M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs by 2 to 4% and water usage increased by 2.5 to 4.1% suggesting that the sustainability of pork production was negatively affected by this bacterial infection. Previous literature on the impact of controlling vaccine-preventable diseases has shown similar results for other swine respiratory pathogens. In addition, these data only included M. hyopneumoniae infected pigs, thus the effect of respiratory co-infections was not estimated and the impact on sustainability metrics may be greater than currently calculated. The application of sustainable practices in animal production, including disease prevention, is key to ensuring a secure food supply for future generations. The carbon and water footprints of swine production are measurements of sustainability, with average daily gain being an important factor.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
University of Minnesota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Microbial infections and disease research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.