235 Impact of yeast cell wall and probiotics on gut microbiota, immunity, and growth in weaned piglets

Abstract This study investigates the effect of yeast cell wall (YCW) supplementation and multispecies probiotics as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) on the gut microbiota, immune function, and growth performance in weaned piglets. We utilized a randomized complete block design involving 160 piglets across four treatments during the nursery phase. The treatments administered throughout the experimental period were as follows: CONT+ = basal diet with Halquinol (AGP); YCW = basal diet with Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cell wall at 1 kg/MT; SIM+ = basal diet with YCW at 0.5 kg/MT + multispecies probiotic (Bacillus subtilis 2.0 x 10^9 CFU/g, Bacillus coagulans 5.0 x 10^8 CFU/g, Clostridium butyricum 5.0 x 10^7 CFU/g, and Bacillus licheniformis 2.0 x 10^9 CFU/g) at 0.6 kg/MT; SIM- = basal diet with YCW at 0.5 kg/MT + multispecies probiotic at 0.3 kg/MT. Methodologies include daily feed intake, body weight gain measurement, feed conversion ratio (FCR), diarrhea scoring, serum cytokine and chemokine concentration, and microbiome analysis. Throughout the study period (21 to 63 d), only FCR showed differences (P = 0.0076). CONT+ and YCW demonstrated better FCRs, at 1.543 and 1.585 respectively, without significant variation between them, while SIM- lagged with the least favorable outcome at 1.654 (Table 1). At 35 d, IL-10 concentrations were greatest in the SIM- group, showing a 271.25% increase compared with other treatments (Figure 2). At 49 d, IL-8 was least in the YCW group, with a 247% reduction compared with CONT+, while SIM+ and SIM- showed no significant differences compared with other treatments (Figure 1). The Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (F/B) ratio shows that the CONT+ treatment was inferior compared with the YCW, SIM+, and SIM- treatments (Figure 3). The Lactobacillaceae family differed between CONT+ and the YCW, SIM+, and SIM- treatments, with the greatest abundance in the SIM+ treatment, followed by SIM- and YCW (Figure 4). The genera Lactobacillus differed between the CONT+ treatment compared with the YCW, SIM+, and SIM- treatments. Prebiotics, whether used alone or combined with probiotics, serve as effective substitutes for AGPs, boosting the health and performance of piglets throughout the nursery phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.275
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

235 Impact of yeast cell wall and probiotics on gut microbiota, immunity, and growth in weaned piglets

Fernando Augusto de Souza, Rafael Humberto de Carvalho, Melina Aparecida Bonato, Soimer Omar Baldera Huamán et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Gut microbiota and health
article

235 Impact of yeast cell wall and probiotics on gut microbiota, immunity, and growth in weaned piglets

Fernando Augusto de Souza, Rafael Humberto de Carvalho, Melina Aparecida Bonato, Soimer Omar Baldera Huamán, Caio Abércio Silva, Marco Callegari, Cleandro A Dias
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the effect of yeast cell wall (YCW) supplementation and multispecies probiotics as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) on the gut microbiota, immune function, and growth performance in weaned piglets. We utilized a randomized complete block design involving 160 piglets across four treatments during the nursery phase. The treatments administered throughout the experimental period were as follows: CONT+ = basal diet with Halquinol (AGP); YCW = basal diet with Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cell wall at 1 kg/MT; SIM+ = basal diet with YCW at 0.5 kg/MT + multispecies probiotic (Bacillus subtilis 2.0 x 10^9 CFU/g, Bacillus coagulans 5.0 x 10^8 CFU/g, Clostridium butyricum 5.0 x 10^7 CFU/g, and Bacillus licheniformis 2.0 x 10^9 CFU/g) at 0.6 kg/MT; SIM- = basal diet with YCW at 0.5 kg/MT + multispecies probiotic at 0.3 kg/MT. Methodologies include daily feed intake, body weight gain measurement, feed conversion ratio (FCR), diarrhea scoring, serum cytokine and chemokine concentration, and microbiome analysis. Throughout the study period (21 to 63 d), only FCR showed differences (P = 0.0076). CONT+ and YCW demonstrated better FCRs, at 1.543 and 1.585 respectively, without significant variation between them, while SIM- lagged with the least favorable outcome at 1.654 (Table 1). At 35 d, IL-10 concentrations were greatest in the SIM- group, showing a 271.25% increase compared with other treatments (Figure 2). At 49 d, IL-8 was least in the YCW group, with a 247% reduction compared with CONT+, while SIM+ and SIM- showed no significant differences compared with other treatments (Figure 1). The Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (F/B) ratio shows that the CONT+ treatment was inferior compared with the YCW, SIM+, and SIM- treatments (Figure 3). The Lactobacillaceae family differed between CONT+ and the YCW, SIM+, and SIM- treatments, with the greatest abundance in the SIM+ treatment, followed by SIM- and YCW (Figure 4). The genera Lactobacillus differed between the CONT+ treatment compared with the YCW, SIM+, and SIM- treatments. Prebiotics, whether used alone or combined with probiotics, serve as effective substitutes for AGPs, boosting the health and performance of piglets throughout the nursery phase.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.