179 Charting the evolution of rumen microbial models from past to present

Abstract This review delves into the intricate realm of ruminal microbes, shedding light on their complexity beyond previously recognized dimensions. Existing publications have probed the essential facets of these microorganisms on a finer scale than previously acknowledged. Mathematical models have emerged to simulate the behavior of approximately 200 distinct bacterial species, 25 genera of ciliate protozoa, and five genera of anaerobic fungi, constituting about 10% of the total viable bacteria in the rumen. However, the expansive diversity and density of rumen microbes challenge the complete characterization of species or genera in relation to substrates or end products. Consequently, continuous revision and re-engineering of mathematical models become imperative. In the context of ruminants, prevalent models often categorize bacteria into fiber-fermenting and nonfiber-fermenting groups. An additional subgroup featuring hyper-ammonia-producing bacteria has been proposed, but its explicit integration into nutrition models remains unexplored. Furthermore, incorporating a more mechanistic evaluation of protozoa and fungal growth may be warranted to improve nutrition models. The time horizon and intervals at which models are constructed present another critical consideration, with feed efficiency variations among ruminants believed to be closely tied to differences in the ruminal microbiota. Addressing immediate concerns, this review underscores the need for a comprehensive exploration of factors influencing microbial growth in the rumen. Several indices have been suggested and adopted to predict microbial efficiencies, but they may provide simplification for practical application. Thus, a mechanistic approach should be considered to remove dependencies between estimates and improve predictive accuracy and precision. While artificial intelligence holds promise in elucidating gaps within empirical and mechanistic models, the generation of accurate, vetted datasets is paramount. Furthermore, this review posits that factors such as recycled nitrogen, endotoxins, and microbial population dynamics (i.e., cross-feeding and competition) may be limiting our understanding of microbial growth, suggesting the necessity of modeling these intricacies concurrently to achieve a more nuanced comprehension. This multifaceted approach aims to propel the understanding of ruminal microbial dynamics into new frontiers, paving the way for more informed and effective modeling in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.451
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

179 Charting the evolution of rumen microbial models from past to present

Pablo Guarnido-Lopez, Luiz Fernando Dias Batista, Mingyung Lee, Luis Orlindo Tedeschi et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

179 Charting the evolution of rumen microbial models from past to present

Pablo Guarnido-Lopez, Luiz Fernando Dias Batista, Mingyung Lee, Luis Orlindo Tedeschi, Jordan Melissa Adams, Keara O’Reilly
article en

Abstract

Abstract This review delves into the intricate realm of ruminal microbes, shedding light on their complexity beyond previously recognized dimensions. Existing publications have probed the essential facets of these microorganisms on a finer scale than previously acknowledged. Mathematical models have emerged to simulate the behavior of approximately 200 distinct bacterial species, 25 genera of ciliate protozoa, and five genera of anaerobic fungi, constituting about 10% of the total viable bacteria in the rumen. However, the expansive diversity and density of rumen microbes challenge the complete characterization of species or genera in relation to substrates or end products. Consequently, continuous revision and re-engineering of mathematical models become imperative. In the context of ruminants, prevalent models often categorize bacteria into fiber-fermenting and nonfiber-fermenting groups. An additional subgroup featuring hyper-ammonia-producing bacteria has been proposed, but its explicit integration into nutrition models remains unexplored. Furthermore, incorporating a more mechanistic evaluation of protozoa and fungal growth may be warranted to improve nutrition models. The time horizon and intervals at which models are constructed present another critical consideration, with feed efficiency variations among ruminants believed to be closely tied to differences in the ruminal microbiota. Addressing immediate concerns, this review underscores the need for a comprehensive exploration of factors influencing microbial growth in the rumen. Several indices have been suggested and adopted to predict microbial efficiencies, but they may provide simplification for practical application. Thus, a mechanistic approach should be considered to remove dependencies between estimates and improve predictive accuracy and precision. While artificial intelligence holds promise in elucidating gaps within empirical and mechanistic models, the generation of accurate, vetted datasets is paramount. Furthermore, this review posits that factors such as recycled nitrogen, endotoxins, and microbial population dynamics (i.e., cross-feeding and competition) may be limiting our understanding of microbial growth, suggesting the necessity of modeling these intricacies concurrently to achieve a more nuanced comprehension. This multifaceted approach aims to propel the understanding of ruminal microbial dynamics into new frontiers, paving the way for more informed and effective modeling in the future.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.