393 The role of on-animal sensors in understanding feed intake, behavior, and performance of grazing livestock

Abstract Intake by grazing animals is difficult to reliably measure in the field, particularly in more diverse grazing systems where pastures vary greatly across time and space in resource availability, which in turn leads to greater variation in animal time budgets and intake patterns. Advances in remote livestock monitoring (e.g., on-animal sensors, walk -over-weighing), and advanced analytics such as machine learning algorithms can contribute to the development of robust, adaptable tools for better understanding of animal performance and behavior in grazing systems. Many existing tools for predicting livestock production require estimates of feed intake, and while estimates based on forage sward characteristics have been developed and used for temperate, relatively homogenous pastures, they are less well defined for more diverse rangelands. These diverse pastures are more difficult to characterize due to their greater variation in quantity and quality; consequently, animal selectivity is greater in more variable pastures. However, such feedback loops between pasture diversity and animal behavior may not yet be adequately represented in biophysical models. On-animal sensors such as accelerometers and GPS devices can be used to develop new ways of assessing relative intake by providing accurate estimates of animal location and behavior profiles, such as the use of machine learning algorithms to detect how much time is spent grazing, walking, ruminating, or resting. Measurements of animal behavior could then be combined with other animal-based methods such as walk-over-weighing and fecal NIR to improve estimates of intake and production for a wide range of extensive grazing environments. Sensor-derived measurements of animal movement could also be used to improve estimates of the energetic costs of grazing, thereby improving estimates of energy available for growth. As an example, data on recent activity and paddock use from on-animal sensors could be entered into a model to estimate current feeding requirements, then combined with weather and pasture quality forecasts. The ensuing baseline could then be used to explore the potential variability of these projections and generate a range for possible expected performance over the next month or season. This approach could be repeated over time, and animal performance and behavior measures used to update model estimates and improve forward projections. These methods could also be used in conjunction with estimates of animal energy requirements to provide real-time prediction of relative feed intake, which would provide a step-change in modelling livestock production in extensive grazing systems. For these approaches to be successful, additional calibration data are needed across a wide variety of environments and species, and the tools must be cost-effective to implement. In summary, on-animal measurements provide an adaptable, data-driven approach that could be integrated with existing tools to improve our understanding of feed intake, behavior, and performance of grazing animals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.221
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

393 The role of on-animal sensors in understanding feed intake, behavior, and performance of grazing livestock

Greg Bishop-Hurley, S.L. Greenwood, James Dougherty, D. Thomas et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

393 The role of on-animal sensors in understanding feed intake, behavior, and performance of grazing livestock

Greg Bishop-Hurley, S.L. Greenwood, James Dougherty, D. Thomas, Aaron B. Ingham, Shuwen Hu, Adam C. Liedloff, E. Charmley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Intake by grazing animals is difficult to reliably measure in the field, particularly in more diverse grazing systems where pastures vary greatly across time and space in resource availability, which in turn leads to greater variation in animal time budgets and intake patterns. Advances in remote livestock monitoring (e.g., on-animal sensors, walk -over-weighing), and advanced analytics such as machine learning algorithms can contribute to the development of robust, adaptable tools for better understanding of animal performance and behavior in grazing systems. Many existing tools for predicting livestock production require estimates of feed intake, and while estimates based on forage sward characteristics have been developed and used for temperate, relatively homogenous pastures, they are less well defined for more diverse rangelands. These diverse pastures are more difficult to characterize due to their greater variation in quantity and quality; consequently, animal selectivity is greater in more variable pastures. However, such feedback loops between pasture diversity and animal behavior may not yet be adequately represented in biophysical models. On-animal sensors such as accelerometers and GPS devices can be used to develop new ways of assessing relative intake by providing accurate estimates of animal location and behavior profiles, such as the use of machine learning algorithms to detect how much time is spent grazing, walking, ruminating, or resting. Measurements of animal behavior could then be combined with other animal-based methods such as walk-over-weighing and fecal NIR to improve estimates of intake and production for a wide range of extensive grazing environments. Sensor-derived measurements of animal movement could also be used to improve estimates of the energetic costs of grazing, thereby improving estimates of energy available for growth. As an example, data on recent activity and paddock use from on-animal sensors could be entered into a model to estimate current feeding requirements, then combined with weather and pasture quality forecasts. The ensuing baseline could then be used to explore the potential variability of these projections and generate a range for possible expected performance over the next month or season. This approach could be repeated over time, and animal performance and behavior measures used to update model estimates and improve forward projections. These methods could also be used in conjunction with estimates of animal energy requirements to provide real-time prediction of relative feed intake, which would provide a step-change in modelling livestock production in extensive grazing systems. For these approaches to be successful, additional calibration data are needed across a wide variety of environments and species, and the tools must be cost-effective to implement. In summary, on-animal measurements provide an adaptable, data-driven approach that could be integrated with existing tools to improve our understanding of feed intake, behavior, and performance of grazing animals.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Agriculture and Food (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.