Outcomes in peripheral right ventricular device support: Comparing the dual lumen, single canula and femoral vein cannulation strategies for right ventricular support

IntroductionThe Protek Duo (PtD) dual lumen, single cannula was developed as a percutaneous system for temporary mechanical support, inserted through the internal jugular vein (IJ) for both atrial inflow and pulmonary artery outflow. Outcomes of PtD compared to alternative Peripheral Right Ventricular Assist Device (pRVAD) methods are limited.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of pRVAD recipients from January 2017 - February 2022 (<i>n</i> = 111). These were classified into PtD (<i>n</i> = 52) patients and Non-Protek [(N-PtD) (<i>n</i> = 59)] recipients undergoing cannulation of the IJ and femoral vein. Results were further stratified by indication for pRVAD support: cardiogenic etiologies of heart failure and progressive ARDS.ResultsNo survival benefit was detected between PtD and N-PtD groups at 1-week (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.49-3.56, <i>p</i> = 0.58) or 6-month (OR: 9.83, 95% CI: 0.37-1.84, <i>p</i> = 0.64) follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in whether patients' mobility progressed to out-of-bed activity (<i>p</i> = 0.26) or ambulation (<i>p</i> = 0.38). No differences were noted in time to out-of-bed (<i>p</i> = 0.26) or time to ambulation (<i>p</i> = 0.36). On subgroup analysis of patients by indication for pRVAD cannulation, these results persisted; no difference was noted in mid-term mortality (Cardiogenic: <i>p</i> = 0.39; ARDS: <i>p</i> = 0.91), progression to out-of-bed (<i>p</i> = 0.59; <i>p</i> = 1.00), or ambulation (<i>p</i> = 0.51; <i>p</i>-0.68). Among secondary outcomes, PtD patients had an increased dialysis requirement (<i>p</i> = 0.02). There were no differences in ability to wean from RVAD (<i>p</i> = 0.06), tracheostomy (<i>p</i> = 0.88), major bleeding events (<i>p</i> = 0.57), stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.58), or hospital length of stay (<i>p</i> = 0.39).ConclusionsOutcomes with PtD are comparable to those of traditional pRVAD cannulation strategies. Of note, no mobility benefit was observed to the use of PtD across several metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perfusion
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241284862
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes in peripheral right ventricular device support: Comparing the dual lumen, single canula and femoral vein cannulation strategies for right ventricular support

Amit A. Pawale, Kunal Deepak Kotkar, Muhammad Masood, Akinobu Itoh et al.
1 citations
Perfusion
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
article

Outcomes in peripheral right ventricular device support: Comparing the dual lumen, single canula and femoral vein cannulation strategies for right ventricular support

Amit A. Pawale, Kunal Deepak Kotkar, Muhammad Masood, Akinobu Itoh, I Florea, Ralph J. Damiano, M. Damiano, I. Fischer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IntroductionThe Protek Duo (PtD) dual lumen, single cannula was developed as a percutaneous system for temporary mechanical support, inserted through the internal jugular vein (IJ) for both atrial inflow and pulmonary artery outflow. Outcomes of PtD compared to alternative Peripheral Right Ventricular Assist Device (pRVAD) methods are limited.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted of pRVAD recipients from January 2017 - February 2022 (<i>n</i> = 111). These were classified into PtD (<i>n</i> = 52) patients and Non-Protek [(N-PtD) (<i>n</i> = 59)] recipients undergoing cannulation of the IJ and femoral vein. Results were further stratified by indication for pRVAD support: cardiogenic etiologies of heart failure and progressive ARDS.ResultsNo survival benefit was detected between PtD and N-PtD groups at 1-week (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.49-3.56, <i>p</i> = 0.58) or 6-month (OR: 9.83, 95% CI: 0.37-1.84, <i>p</i> = 0.64) follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in whether patients' mobility progressed to out-of-bed activity (<i>p</i> = 0.26) or ambulation (<i>p</i> = 0.38). No differences were noted in time to out-of-bed (<i>p</i> = 0.26) or time to ambulation (<i>p</i> = 0.36). On subgroup analysis of patients by indication for pRVAD cannulation, these results persisted; no difference was noted in mid-term mortality (Cardiogenic: <i>p</i> = 0.39; ARDS: <i>p</i> = 0.91), progression to out-of-bed (<i>p</i> = 0.59; <i>p</i> = 1.00), or ambulation (<i>p</i> = 0.51; <i>p</i>-0.68). Among secondary outcomes, PtD patients had an increased dialysis requirement (<i>p</i> = 0.02). There were no differences in ability to wean from RVAD (<i>p</i> = 0.06), tracheostomy (<i>p</i> = 0.88), major bleeding events (<i>p</i> = 0.57), stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.58), or hospital length of stay (<i>p</i> = 0.39).ConclusionsOutcomes with PtD are comparable to those of traditional pRVAD cannulation strategies. Of note, no mobility benefit was observed to the use of PtD across several metrics.

PerfusionVol. 40(5)
Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US), Jewish Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.