Benchmark Study of Core-Ionization Energies with the Generalized Active Space-Driven Similarity Renormalization Group

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a powerful experimental technique for probing the electronic structure of molecules and materials; however, interpreting XPS data requires accurate computational methods to model core-ionized states. This work proposes and benchmarks a new approach based on the generalized active space-driven similarity renormalization group (GAS-DSRG) for calculating core-ionization energies and treating correlation effects at the perturbative and nonperturbative levels. We tested the GAS-DSRG across three data sets. First, the vertical core-ionization energies of small molecules containing first-row elements are evaluated. GAS-DSRG achieves mean absolute errors below 0.3 eV, which is comparable to high-level coupled cluster methods. Next, the accuracy of GAS-DSRG is evaluated for larger organic molecules using the CORE65 data set, with the DSRG-MRPT3 level yielding a mean absolute error of only 0.34 eV for 65 core-ionization transitions. Insights are provided into the treatment of static and dynamic correlation, the importance of high-order perturbation theory, and notable differences from density functional theory in the predicted energy ordering of core-ionized states for specific molecules. Finally, vibrationally resolved XPS spectra of diatomic molecules (CO, N<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>2</sub>) are simulated, showing excellent agreement with experimental data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00835
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Atomic and Molecular Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmark Study of Core-Ionization Energies with the Generalized Active Space-Driven Similarity Renormalization Group

Meng Huang, Francesco A. Evangelista
6 citations
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Atomic and Molecular Physics
2.03
article

Benchmark Study of Core-Ionization Energies with the Generalized Active Space-Driven Similarity Renormalization Group

Meng Huang, Francesco A. Evangelista
article en
6 citations

Abstract

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a powerful experimental technique for probing the electronic structure of molecules and materials; however, interpreting XPS data requires accurate computational methods to model core-ionized states. This work proposes and benchmarks a new approach based on the generalized active space-driven similarity renormalization group (GAS-DSRG) for calculating core-ionization energies and treating correlation effects at the perturbative and nonperturbative levels. We tested the GAS-DSRG across three data sets. First, the vertical core-ionization energies of small molecules containing first-row elements are evaluated. GAS-DSRG achieves mean absolute errors below 0.3 eV, which is comparable to high-level coupled cluster methods. Next, the accuracy of GAS-DSRG is evaluated for larger organic molecules using the CORE65 data set, with the DSRG-MRPT3 level yielding a mean absolute error of only 0.34 eV for 65 core-ionization transitions. Insights are provided into the treatment of static and dynamic correlation, the importance of high-order perturbation theory, and notable differences from density functional theory in the predicted energy ordering of core-ionized states for specific molecules. Finally, vibrationally resolved XPS spectra of diatomic molecules (CO, N<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>2</sub>) are simulated, showing excellent agreement with experimental data.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Emory University (US), Emerson (United States) (US), Atlanta University Center (US)
National Science Foundation, Division of Chemistry
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Atomic and Molecular Physics
2.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.