Prostate MRI Transitional Zone Volume Predicts BPH Enucleation Volume Better than Alternative Modalities

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Guidelines for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) interventions are volume based. The degree to which different imaging modalities actually correlate to treated volume is not known for BPH. The present study compares the accuracy of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MRI-transitional zone (TZ) to BPH enucleation weight. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective review of patients who underwent enucleation for BPH and had preoperative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), CT, and/or MRI was performed. Total prostate volumes were measured for CT, MRI, and TRUS; MRI-TZ volume was also measured. The primary outcome was difference between enucleated pathology weight in grams and preoperative imaging volume. Differences between enucleation and imaging volume for each modality were calculated with one-way analysis of variance, with Tukey's honest significance test to determine pairwise significance (RStudio V1.2). <b><i>Results:</i></b> From January to October 2020, there were 114 preoperative imaging studies available for 95 patients. Thirty-four (30%) of the studies were TRUS, 46 (40%) were CT, and 34 (30%) were MRI. MRI-TZ most accurately predicted enucleation volume on multivariate analysis (F-statistic <i>p</i>-value < 0.001). Preoperative imaging was greater than enucleation volume by a median of 46 cc for TRUS, 51 cc for CT, 53 cc for MRI, and 14 cc for MRI-TZ. Pairwise significance was reached for MRI-TZ over CT (<i>p</i>-adj < 0.001), MRI-TZ over MRI (<i>p</i>-adj < 0.001) and MRI-TZ over US (<i>p</i>-adj = 0.03). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Enucleation volume for BPH was most accurately predicted by TZ volume on MRI compared with total prostate volume on CT, TRUS, and MRI. MRI total volume was not superior to CT total volume. Focusing on MRI-TZ volume rather than total prostate volume may more accurately stratify patients for BPH treatment. In experienced hands, median enucleation volume is within 14 cc of MRI-TZ volume.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endourology
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0280
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prostate MRI Transitional Zone Volume Predicts BPH Enucleation Volume Better than Alternative Modalities

Christina Peterson, Connor M. Forbes, Nicole L. Miller
2 citations
Journal of Endourology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
0.84
article

Prostate MRI Transitional Zone Volume Predicts BPH Enucleation Volume Better than Alternative Modalities

Christina Peterson, Connor M. Forbes, Nicole L. Miller
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Guidelines for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) interventions are volume based. The degree to which different imaging modalities actually correlate to treated volume is not known for BPH. The present study compares the accuracy of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MRI-transitional zone (TZ) to BPH enucleation weight. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective review of patients who underwent enucleation for BPH and had preoperative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), CT, and/or MRI was performed. Total prostate volumes were measured for CT, MRI, and TRUS; MRI-TZ volume was also measured. The primary outcome was difference between enucleated pathology weight in grams and preoperative imaging volume. Differences between enucleation and imaging volume for each modality were calculated with one-way analysis of variance, with Tukey's honest significance test to determine pairwise significance (RStudio V1.2). <b><i>Results:</i></b> From January to October 2020, there were 114 preoperative imaging studies available for 95 patients. Thirty-four (30%) of the studies were TRUS, 46 (40%) were CT, and 34 (30%) were MRI. MRI-TZ most accurately predicted enucleation volume on multivariate analysis (F-statistic <i>p</i>-value < 0.001). Preoperative imaging was greater than enucleation volume by a median of 46 cc for TRUS, 51 cc for CT, 53 cc for MRI, and 14 cc for MRI-TZ. Pairwise significance was reached for MRI-TZ over CT (<i>p</i>-adj < 0.001), MRI-TZ over MRI (<i>p</i>-adj < 0.001) and MRI-TZ over US (<i>p</i>-adj = 0.03). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Enucleation volume for BPH was most accurately predicted by TZ volume on MRI compared with total prostate volume on CT, TRUS, and MRI. MRI total volume was not superior to CT total volume. Focusing on MRI-TZ volume rather than total prostate volume may more accurately stratify patients for BPH treatment. In experienced hands, median enucleation volume is within 14 cc of MRI-TZ volume.

Journal of EndourologyVol. 38(12)
University of British Columbia (CA), The Prostate Centre (GB), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.