Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of polygenic risk score-stratified screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm

As the heritability of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is high and AAA partially shares genetic architecture with other cardiovascular diseases, genetic information could help inform AAA screening strategies. Exploiting pleiotropy and meta-analysing summary data from large studies, we construct a polygenic risk score (PRS) for AAA. Leveraging related traits improves PRS performance (R<sup>2</sup>) by 22.7%, relative to using AAA alone. Compared with the low PRS tertile, intermediate and high tertiles have hazard ratios for AAA of 2.13 (95%CI 1.61, 2.82) and 3.70 (95%CI 2.86, 4.80) respectively, adjusted for clinical risk factors. Using simulation modelling, we compare PRS- and smoking-stratified screening with inviting men at age 65 and not inviting women (current UK strategy). In a futuristic scenario where genomic information is available, our modelling suggests inviting male current smokers with high PRS earlier than 65 and screening female smokers with high/intermediate PRS at 65 and 70 respectively, may improve cost-effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52452-w
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of polygenic risk score-stratified screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Angela Wood, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, John Danesh, Michael Sweeting et al.
8 citations
Nature Communications
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
3.35
article

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of polygenic risk score-stratified screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Angela Wood, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, John Danesh, Michael Sweeting, John D. O’Sullivan, Lisa Pennells, Michael Inouye, Martin Kelemen, Lois G. Kim, Tarit Roychowdhury, Simon James Harrison
article en
8 citations

Abstract

As the heritability of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is high and AAA partially shares genetic architecture with other cardiovascular diseases, genetic information could help inform AAA screening strategies. Exploiting pleiotropy and meta-analysing summary data from large studies, we construct a polygenic risk score (PRS) for AAA. Leveraging related traits improves PRS performance (R<sup>2</sup>) by 22.7%, relative to using AAA alone. Compared with the low PRS tertile, intermediate and high tertiles have hazard ratios for AAA of 2.13 (95%CI 1.61, 2.82) and 3.70 (95%CI 2.86, 4.80) respectively, adjusted for clinical risk factors. Using simulation modelling, we compare PRS- and smoking-stratified screening with inviting men at age 65 and not inviting women (current UK strategy). In a futuristic scenario where genomic information is available, our modelling suggests inviting male current smokers with high PRS earlier than 65 and screening female smokers with high/intermediate PRS at 65 and 70 respectively, may improve cost-effectiveness.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 15(1)
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU), University of Leicester (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), British Heart Foundation (GB), Yale University (US), Cambridge University Health Partners (GB), Genomics (United Kingdom) (GB), Stanford University (US)
Wellcome Trust, Scottish Government, UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health and Social Care, Public Health Agency, Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate, Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
3.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.