Carbon emission from the Lower Ob River floodplain during spring flood

Carbon emission from Arctic rivers constitutes a positive feedback between the climate warming and C cycle. However, in case of rivers with extensive floodplains, the impacts of temporary water bodies and secondary channels on CO<sub>2</sub> exchange with atmosphere, compared to the main stem and tributaries, remain strongly understudied. In order to quantify the relative role of various water bodies of the Arctic river basin in the C cycle, the hydrochemical variables and greenhouse gases GHG concentrations and fluxes were measured within the floodplain of the largest Arctic River, Ob, in its low reaches located in the permafrost zone. These included the main stem, secondary channels, tributaries and floodplain lakes sampled over a 900 km north-south transect (25,736 km<sup>2</sup> of the main stem and adjacent floodplain area; 7893 km<sup>2</sup> water surface) during peak of spring flood (May 2023). In addition to main stem and tributaries, providing less than a half of overall C flux, floodplain lakes and secondary channels acted as important factor of C emission from the floodplain water surfaces. Multi-parametric statistical treatment of the data suggested two main processes of C emission from the Ob River floodplain waters: terrestrial organic matter-rich flooded wetlands (fens) provided elevated pCO<sub>2</sub>, whereas the sites of possible groundwater discharge in the secondary channels decreased the CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes due to more alkaline environments, rich in labile metals and anionic elements. Based on available high-resolution Landsat-8 images, which matched the period of field work, it was found that the total water coverage of the floodplain during spring 2023 was 30 % of overall territory, compared to 18 % during the baseflow. Based on chamber-measured CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes (1.56 ± 0.47 g C-CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> d<sup>-1</sup>), overall CO<sub>2</sub> emissions during 2 months of the spring flood from the entire Lower Ob River floodplain water surfaces including the main stem amounted to 0.73 ± 0.25 Tg C. Diffuse CH<sub>4</sub> flux represented <1 % of total C flux. The main stem of the Ob River accounted for 34 % and 18 % of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, respectively, whereas the floodplain lakes provided 59 % and 50 % of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emission, respectively. Considering that the low reaches of the Ob River represent >70 % of total river basin floodplain, and that during some years, the entire floodplain can be covered by water, emissions from the river - if assessed solely from summer (July-August) measurements - can be at least 3 times underestimated. It is therefore important to account for extended water surface during high water levels on Arctic rivers when assessing global riverine C emissions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176294
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon emission from the Lower Ob River floodplain during spring flood

Sergey N. Vorobyev, I.E. Kolesnichenko, Oleg S. Pokrovsky, Jan Ch. Karlsson
8 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Climate change and permafrost
3.01
article

Carbon emission from the Lower Ob River floodplain during spring flood

Sergey N. Vorobyev, I.E. Kolesnichenko, Oleg S. Pokrovsky, Jan Ch. Karlsson
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Carbon emission from Arctic rivers constitutes a positive feedback between the climate warming and C cycle. However, in case of rivers with extensive floodplains, the impacts of temporary water bodies and secondary channels on CO<sub>2</sub> exchange with atmosphere, compared to the main stem and tributaries, remain strongly understudied. In order to quantify the relative role of various water bodies of the Arctic river basin in the C cycle, the hydrochemical variables and greenhouse gases GHG concentrations and fluxes were measured within the floodplain of the largest Arctic River, Ob, in its low reaches located in the permafrost zone. These included the main stem, secondary channels, tributaries and floodplain lakes sampled over a 900 km north-south transect (25,736 km<sup>2</sup> of the main stem and adjacent floodplain area; 7893 km<sup>2</sup> water surface) during peak of spring flood (May 2023). In addition to main stem and tributaries, providing less than a half of overall C flux, floodplain lakes and secondary channels acted as important factor of C emission from the floodplain water surfaces. Multi-parametric statistical treatment of the data suggested two main processes of C emission from the Ob River floodplain waters: terrestrial organic matter-rich flooded wetlands (fens) provided elevated pCO<sub>2</sub>, whereas the sites of possible groundwater discharge in the secondary channels decreased the CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes due to more alkaline environments, rich in labile metals and anionic elements. Based on available high-resolution Landsat-8 images, which matched the period of field work, it was found that the total water coverage of the floodplain during spring 2023 was 30 % of overall territory, compared to 18 % during the baseflow. Based on chamber-measured CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes (1.56 ± 0.47 g C-CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> d<sup>-1</sup>), overall CO<sub>2</sub> emissions during 2 months of the spring flood from the entire Lower Ob River floodplain water surfaces including the main stem amounted to 0.73 ± 0.25 Tg C. Diffuse CH<sub>4</sub> flux represented <1 % of total C flux. The main stem of the Ob River accounted for 34 % and 18 % of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, respectively, whereas the floodplain lakes provided 59 % and 50 % of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emission, respectively. Considering that the low reaches of the Ob River represent >70 % of total river basin floodplain, and that during some years, the entire floodplain can be covered by water, emissions from the river - if assessed solely from summer (July-August) measurements - can be at least 3 times underestimated. It is therefore important to account for extended water surface during high water levels on Arctic rivers when assessing global riverine C emissions.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 954
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), National Research Tomsk State University (RU), Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (FR), Umeå University (SE)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Russian Science Foundation, Tomsk State University
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate change and permafrost
3.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.