Paths to robust exoplanet science yield margin for the Habitable Worlds Observatory

The Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) will seek to detect and characterize potentially Earth-like planets around other stars. To ensure that the mission achieves the Astro2020 Decadal’s recommended goal of 25 exoEarth candidates (EECs), we must take into account the probabilistic nature of exoplanet detections and provide a “science margin” to budget for astrophysical uncertainties with a reasonable level of confidence. We explore the probabilistic distributions of yields to be expected from a blind exoEarth survey conducted by such a mission. We identify and estimate the impact of all major known sources of astrophysical uncertainty on the EEC yield. As expected, η⊕ uncertainties dominate the uncertainty in EEC yield, but we show that sampling uncertainties inherent to a blind survey are another important source of uncertainty that should be budgeted for during mission design. We adopt the Large UV/Optical/IR Surveyor Design B (LUVOIR-B) as a baseline and modify the telescope diameter to estimate the science margin provided by a larger telescope. We then depart from the LUVOIR-B baseline design and identify six possible design changes that, when compiled, provide large gains in EEC yield and more than an order of magnitude reduction in exposure times for the highest priority targets. We conclude that a combination of telescope diameter increase and design improvements could provide robust exoplanet science margins for HWO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jatis.10.3.034006
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paths to robust exoplanet science yield margin for the Habitable Worlds Observatory

Eric B. Ford, Matthew R. Bolcar, Dan Sirbu, Steve Bryson et al.
21 citations
Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
10.63
article

Paths to robust exoplanet science yield margin for the Habitable Worlds Observatory

Eric B. Ford, Matthew R. Bolcar, Dan Sirbu, Steve Bryson, Olivier Guyon, Bernard J. Rauscher, Bertrand Mennesson, Tyler D. Robinson, Noah W. Tuchow, Natasha Latouf, Avi M. Mandell, Ruslan Belikov, Christopher C. Stark, Lee D. Feinberg
article en
21 citations

Abstract

The Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) will seek to detect and characterize potentially Earth-like planets around other stars. To ensure that the mission achieves the Astro2020 Decadal’s recommended goal of 25 exoEarth candidates (EECs), we must take into account the probabilistic nature of exoplanet detections and provide a “science margin” to budget for astrophysical uncertainties with a reasonable level of confidence. We explore the probabilistic distributions of yields to be expected from a blind exoEarth survey conducted by such a mission. We identify and estimate the impact of all major known sources of astrophysical uncertainty on the EEC yield. As expected, η⊕ uncertainties dominate the uncertainty in EEC yield, but we show that sampling uncertainties inherent to a blind survey are another important source of uncertainty that should be budgeted for during mission design. We adopt the Large UV/Optical/IR Surveyor Design B (LUVOIR-B) as a baseline and modify the telescope diameter to estimate the science margin provided by a larger telescope. We then depart from the LUVOIR-B baseline design and identify six possible design changes that, when compiled, provide large gains in EEC yield and more than an order of magnitude reduction in exposure times for the highest priority targets. We conclude that a combination of telescope diameter increase and design improvements could provide robust exoplanet science margins for HWO.

Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and SystemsVol. 10(03)
Ames Research Center (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of Arizona (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University, Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA Headquarters
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
10.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.