Arrival Times Versus Detection Times

Abstract How to compute the probability distribution of a detection time, i.e., of the time which a detector registers as the arrival time of a quantum particle, is a long-debated problem. In this regard, Bohmian mechanics provides in a straightforward way the distribution of the time at which the particle actually does arrive at a given surface in 3-space in the absence of detectors. However, as we discuss here, since the presence of detectors can change the evolution of the wave function and thus the particle trajectories, it cannot be taken for granted that the arrival time of the Bohmian trajectories in the absence of detectors agrees with the one in the presence of detectors, and even less with the detection time. In particular, we explain why certain distributions that Das and Dürr (Sci. Rep. 9: 2242, 2019) presented as the distribution of the detection time in a case with spin, based on assuming that all three times mentioned coincide, are actually not what Bohmian mechanics predicts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foundations of Physics
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-024-00798-y
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arrival Times Versus Detection Times

Sheldon Goldstein, Roderich Tumulka, Nino Zanghı̀
11 citations
Foundations of Physics
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
3.38
article

Arrival Times Versus Detection Times

Sheldon Goldstein, Roderich Tumulka, Nino Zanghı̀
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract How to compute the probability distribution of a detection time, i.e., of the time which a detector registers as the arrival time of a quantum particle, is a long-debated problem. In this regard, Bohmian mechanics provides in a straightforward way the distribution of the time at which the particle actually does arrive at a given surface in 3-space in the absence of detectors. However, as we discuss here, since the presence of detectors can change the evolution of the wave function and thus the particle trajectories, it cannot be taken for granted that the arrival time of the Bohmian trajectories in the absence of detectors agrees with the one in the presence of detectors, and even less with the detection time. In particular, we explain why certain distributions that Das and Dürr (Sci. Rep. 9: 2242, 2019) presented as the distribution of the detection time in a case with spin, based on assuming that all three times mentioned coincide, are actually not what Bohmian mechanics predicts.

Foundations of PhysicsVol. 54(5)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Genova (IT), University of Tübingen (DE)
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
3.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.