Regulatory readiness to facilitate the appropriate use of innovation in clinical trials: The case of decentralized clinical trial approaches

Methodological and operational clinical trial innovation is needed to address key challenges associated with clinical trials, including limited generalizability and (s)low recruitment rates. In this article, we discuss how appropriate implementation of innovative clinical trial approaches can be facilitated by a timely identification of, and response to, emerging situations and innovation by regulators (i.e. regulatory readiness) using decentralized clinical trial (DCT) approaches - in which trial activities are moved closer to participants and away from the investigative sites - as a case study example. Specifically, we discuss how explorative research (e.g. using regulatory sandboxes) can enable the collection of data on the usefulness of DCT approaches. Additionally, we argue that DCT approaches should be evaluated similarly to conventional clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Discovery Today
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104180
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory readiness to facilitate the appropriate use of innovation in clinical trials: The case of decentralized clinical trial approaches

Yared Santa‐Ana‐Téllez, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Helga Gardarsdóttir, Anthonius de Boer et al.
2 citations
Drug Discovery Today
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
0.65
article

Regulatory readiness to facilitate the appropriate use of innovation in clinical trials: The case of decentralized clinical trial approaches

Yared Santa‐Ana‐Téllez, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Helga Gardarsdóttir, Anthonius de Boer, Amos J. de Jong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Methodological and operational clinical trial innovation is needed to address key challenges associated with clinical trials, including limited generalizability and (s)low recruitment rates. In this article, we discuss how appropriate implementation of innovative clinical trial approaches can be facilitated by a timely identification of, and response to, emerging situations and innovation by regulators (i.e. regulatory readiness) using decentralized clinical trial (DCT) approaches - in which trial activities are moved closer to participants and away from the investigative sites - as a case study example. Specifically, we discuss how explorative research (e.g. using regulatory sandboxes) can enable the collection of data on the usefulness of DCT approaches. Additionally, we argue that DCT approaches should be evaluated similarly to conventional clinical trials.

Drug Discovery TodayVol. 29(11)
Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Pharmo Institute (NL), Medicines Evaluation Board (NL)
Innovative Medicines Initiative
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.