Understanding variations in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across space and time: The importance of norm perceptions and political dynamics

Abstract The 21st century has seen dynamic social, legal, and political change regarding the rights and acceptance of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer/questioning (LGBTIQ+) people. This article argues that social norm perceptions—perceptions of other people's opinions in a given social context—and the political dynamics that shape those perceptions are important for understanding differences in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across sociopolitical environments and time periods. Instead of emphasizing “actual” norms — people's opinions on average in different groups — we focus on norm perceptions since people often conform to the attitudes and behaviors held and endorsed by others to achieve social belonging and accuracy in their judgments. We review evidence regarding structural (e.g., laws and institutional decisions), group (e.g., social identities), and individual (e.g., ideology) factors that influence perceptions of, and conformity to, norms of LGBTIQ+ inclusion or exclusion. Drawing on this review, we consider how political dynamics — the ways that civic and political actors make salient, promote, and frame issues, values, and norms in contesting or maintaining the status quo — influence interpretations of, and responses to, norm signals, thus shaping differences in LGBTIQ+ rights norms across contexts and time periods. In conclusion, we chart future areas for research, policy, and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Issues
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12638
Citations
8
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding variations in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across space and time: The importance of norm perceptions and political dynamics

Tabea Häßler, Mary E. Kite, Peter Hegarty, Michael M. Sweigart et al.
8 citations
Journal of Social Issues
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
5.15
article

Understanding variations in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across space and time: The importance of norm perceptions and political dynamics

Tabea Häßler, Mary E. Kite, Peter Hegarty, Michael M. Sweigart, Eugene K. Ofosu, Danna Galván-Hernández, Léïla Eisner, Banu C. Ünsal
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The 21st century has seen dynamic social, legal, and political change regarding the rights and acceptance of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer/questioning (LGBTIQ+) people. This article argues that social norm perceptions—perceptions of other people's opinions in a given social context—and the political dynamics that shape those perceptions are important for understanding differences in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across sociopolitical environments and time periods. Instead of emphasizing “actual” norms — people's opinions on average in different groups — we focus on norm perceptions since people often conform to the attitudes and behaviors held and endorsed by others to achieve social belonging and accuracy in their judgments. We review evidence regarding structural (e.g., laws and institutional decisions), group (e.g., social identities), and individual (e.g., ideology) factors that influence perceptions of, and conformity to, norms of LGBTIQ+ inclusion or exclusion. Drawing on this review, we consider how political dynamics — the ways that civic and political actors make salient, promote, and frame issues, values, and norms in contesting or maintaining the status quo — influence interpretations of, and responses to, norm signals, thus shaping differences in LGBTIQ+ rights norms across contexts and time periods. In conclusion, we chart future areas for research, policy, and practice.

Journal of Social IssuesVol. 80(3)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), George Mason University (US), Universidad de Granada (ES), Ball State University (US), Princeton University (US), University of Zurich (CH), The Open University (GB), Princeton Public Schools (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.