Audience performance and sports fandom rhetorics during 2020 presidential election debate watch parties

People who participated in the 2020 US presidential election debates by organizing or attending debate watch parties provide a case study of audience performance and fandom. While political fandom has been thoroughly documented as a phenomenon, I continue the conversation by showing what localized audience practices look like vis-à-vis physical and virtual debate watch parties. An ethnographic narrative excavation of debate watch parties, compiled from participant observations, field notes, and interviews, reveals three roles that audiences performed as they participated in these 2020 events—Marketeers, Public Seekers, and Activists—as well as how the rhetorics of sports fandom can contribute to the affective environment of an election. These audiences demonstrate the concept of creative narrative appropriation, particularly in the blending of electoral with sports spectatorship. By framing debate watch parties within narratives of sports fandom, these audiences help us better understand how debate watch parties facilitate political engagement in electoral politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transformative Works and Cultures
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2024.2501
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audience performance and sports fandom rhetorics during 2020 presidential election debate watch parties

Adam Nicholas Cohen
Transformative Works and Cultures
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

Audience performance and sports fandom rhetorics during 2020 presidential election debate watch parties

Adam Nicholas Cohen
article en

Abstract

People who participated in the 2020 US presidential election debates by organizing or attending debate watch parties provide a case study of audience performance and fandom. While political fandom has been thoroughly documented as a phenomenon, I continue the conversation by showing what localized audience practices look like vis-à-vis physical and virtual debate watch parties. An ethnographic narrative excavation of debate watch parties, compiled from participant observations, field notes, and interviews, reveals three roles that audiences performed as they participated in these 2020 events—Marketeers, Public Seekers, and Activists—as well as how the rhetorics of sports fandom can contribute to the affective environment of an election. These audiences demonstrate the concept of creative narrative appropriation, particularly in the blending of electoral with sports spectatorship. By framing debate watch parties within narratives of sports fandom, these audiences help us better understand how debate watch parties facilitate political engagement in electoral politics.

Transformative Works and CulturesVol. 43
Bowling Green State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Audience performance and sports fandom rhetorics during 2020 presidential election debate watch parties — Adam Nicholas Cohen · Transformative Works and Cultures (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS