To fan or antifan, that is the question

We introduce the complicated relationship between Shakespeare, performance studies, and fan studies before focusing on antifandom. In conjunction with evolving perspectives on antifan activities in recent years, we identify two broad, sometimes overlapping, categories of Shakespeare antifandom: (1) external antifandom or trolling that challenges the quality of his work or the perception of its cultural and intellectual value; and (2) internal antifandom or gatekeeping couched as a defense of Shakespeare against perceived threats posed by other Shakespeareans. In the process, we historicize Shakespeare antifandom activities and perspectives from Robert Greene to the present in order to answer the question, What does Shakespeare antifandom look like, and what are productive, rather than reductive, ways to engage with it? Over the course of this discussion, we offer the theoretical framework for the collection as a whole before explaining the organizational logic of the volume and overviewing the individual chapters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transformative Works and Cultures
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2024.2621
Primary Topic
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To fan or antifan, that is the question

Johnathan H. Pope, Kavita Mudan Finn
Transformative Works and Cultures
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
article

To fan or antifan, that is the question

Johnathan H. Pope, Kavita Mudan Finn
article en

Abstract

We introduce the complicated relationship between Shakespeare, performance studies, and fan studies before focusing on antifandom. In conjunction with evolving perspectives on antifan activities in recent years, we identify two broad, sometimes overlapping, categories of Shakespeare antifandom: (1) external antifandom or trolling that challenges the quality of his work or the perception of its cultural and intellectual value; and (2) internal antifandom or gatekeeping couched as a defense of Shakespeare against perceived threats posed by other Shakespeareans. In the process, we historicize Shakespeare antifandom activities and perspectives from Robert Greene to the present in order to answer the question, What does Shakespeare antifandom look like, and what are productive, rather than reductive, ways to engage with it? Over the course of this discussion, we offer the theoretical framework for the collection as a whole before explaining the organizational logic of the volume and overviewing the individual chapters.

Transformative Works and CulturesVol. 43
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Film Independent (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.