Place and role of compression therapy in modern minimally invasive treatment of varicose veins

Chronic venous disease (CVD), which includes varicose veins (VVs) of the lower limbs, is one of the most common and socially significant cardiovascular diseases. Despite the recognition of elastic compression as an essential method of CVD treatment, the benefits and feasibility of its usage during the perioperative period are being reconsidered. This narrative literature review aims to highlight the current evidence of the efficacy of elastic compression in relieving initial and residual vein-specific symptoms, reducing the risk of adverse events and VVs recurrence after surgical treatment. It also provides brief information about the mechanisms of action of compression therapy and discusses compliance issues. Nowadays, the concept of the influence of elastic compression on the diameter of veins and venous outflow velocity has been critically revised. It has been shown that deep veins are more sensitive to external compression, while it is impossible to reduce the caliber of superficial veins under the usual pressure. Extensive evidence indicates the efficacy of compression therapy in relieving venous symptoms, which may persist in 30—40% of patients after surgery. The usage of compression therapy perioperatively helps reduce the rate and severity of such adverse events as pain, bruising, and hyperpigmentation, as well as promotes the resorption of veins after sclerotherapy. However, the optimal mode and duration of compression have not been finally determined. Despite the presence of individual studies, the effect of compression therapy on the progression of CVD and the risk of VVs recurrence has not been proven. The main disadvantage of elastic compression is relatively low compliance, which varies between 26 and 74%. To improve it, both motivational conversations by the doctor and efforts by manufacturers to maintain maximal product quality while giving them optimal properties for comfortable wear are essential. Thus, compression therapy is still an important component of the perioperative treatment of VVs of the lower limb.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Venous Disorders
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202418031246
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Place and role of compression therapy in modern minimally invasive treatment of varicose veins

Kirill Victorovich Lobastov, Astanda Bargandzhiya, Leonid Laberko, Anna Kovalchuk et al.
2 citations
Journal of Venous Disorders
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
1.15
article

Place and role of compression therapy in modern minimally invasive treatment of varicose veins

Kirill Victorovich Lobastov, Astanda Bargandzhiya, Leonid Laberko, Anna Kovalchuk, V. V. Kozlova
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Chronic venous disease (CVD), which includes varicose veins (VVs) of the lower limbs, is one of the most common and socially significant cardiovascular diseases. Despite the recognition of elastic compression as an essential method of CVD treatment, the benefits and feasibility of its usage during the perioperative period are being reconsidered. This narrative literature review aims to highlight the current evidence of the efficacy of elastic compression in relieving initial and residual vein-specific symptoms, reducing the risk of adverse events and VVs recurrence after surgical treatment. It also provides brief information about the mechanisms of action of compression therapy and discusses compliance issues. Nowadays, the concept of the influence of elastic compression on the diameter of veins and venous outflow velocity has been critically revised. It has been shown that deep veins are more sensitive to external compression, while it is impossible to reduce the caliber of superficial veins under the usual pressure. Extensive evidence indicates the efficacy of compression therapy in relieving venous symptoms, which may persist in 30—40% of patients after surgery. The usage of compression therapy perioperatively helps reduce the rate and severity of such adverse events as pain, bruising, and hyperpigmentation, as well as promotes the resorption of veins after sclerotherapy. However, the optimal mode and duration of compression have not been finally determined. Despite the presence of individual studies, the effect of compression therapy on the progression of CVD and the risk of VVs recurrence has not been proven. The main disadvantage of elastic compression is relatively low compliance, which varies between 26 and 74%. To improve it, both motivational conversations by the doctor and efforts by manufacturers to maintain maximal product quality while giving them optimal properties for comfortable wear are essential. Thus, compression therapy is still an important component of the perioperative treatment of VVs of the lower limb.

Journal of Venous DisordersVol. 18(3)
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.