Game-Theoretic Analysis of Adversarial Decision Making in a Complex Socio-Physical System

Abstract The growing integration of technology within human processes has significantly increased the difficulty in optimising organisational decision-making, due to the highly coupled and non-linear nature of these systems. This is particularly true in the presence of dynamics for resource competition models between adversarial teams. While game theory provides a conceptual lens for studying such processes, it often struggles with the scale associated with real-world systems. This paper contributes to resolving this limitation through a parallelised variant of the efficient-but-exact nash dominant game pruning framework, which we employ to study the optimal behaviour under adversarial team dynamics parameterised by the so-called networked Boyd–Kuramoto–Lanchester resource competition model. In doing so, we demonstrate a structural bias in competitive systems towards concentrating organisational resources away from regions of competition to ensure resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dynamic Games and Applications
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-024-00593-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Game-Theoretic Analysis of Adversarial Decision Making in a Complex Socio-Physical System

Alexander C. Kalloniatis, Andrew J. Cullen, Tansu Alpcan
1 citations
Dynamic Games and Applications
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
0.28
article

Game-Theoretic Analysis of Adversarial Decision Making in a Complex Socio-Physical System

Alexander C. Kalloniatis, Andrew J. Cullen, Tansu Alpcan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The growing integration of technology within human processes has significantly increased the difficulty in optimising organisational decision-making, due to the highly coupled and non-linear nature of these systems. This is particularly true in the presence of dynamics for resource competition models between adversarial teams. While game theory provides a conceptual lens for studying such processes, it often struggles with the scale associated with real-world systems. This paper contributes to resolving this limitation through a parallelised variant of the efficient-but-exact nash dominant game pruning framework, which we employ to study the optimal behaviour under adversarial team dynamics parameterised by the so-called networked Boyd–Kuramoto–Lanchester resource competition model. In doing so, we demonstrate a structural bias in competitive systems towards concentrating organisational resources away from regions of competition to ensure resilience.

Dynamic Games and ApplicationsVol. 15(3)
Defence Science and Technology Group (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU)
University of Melbourne, Defence Science and Technology Group
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.