266 Breed differences in feeding behavior measured by two remote monitoring technologies in feedlot steers

Abstract Estimation of individual dry matter intake (DMI) is required to optimize feed efficiency, carcass endpoint and profitability of feedlot cattle. However, measuring individual DMI is not practical or economically viable in a commercial setting. It is suggested that feeding behavior measured by remote monitoring technologies could be used to predict DMI of feedlot steers in real-time. However, inherent differences between breeds could influence DMI and feeding behavior and therefore these may need to be considered to predict DMI from feeding behavior. The objective of the present study was to assess differences between breeds in DMI and feeding behavior using data collected from radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags linked to electronic feeders and smart ear tags with accelerometers. Twenty-four steers from each breed [Angus, Brahman and Charolais; initial body weight (BW) = 335 ± 25.0 kg/steer) were fed using 10 electronic feeders in a serial slaughter trial for up to 200 d with 50 d slaughter intervals. Data were averaged per animal and ANOVA was performed with fixed effects of breed and length of the feeding period. There was no interaction between breed and length of feeding period (P > 0.05). DMI, feeding time and visit length measured by RFID, were less in Brahman compared with Angus and Charolais steers (P < 0.05). Eating rate (g/min) was not affected by breeds (P > 0.05); however, Brahmans ate faster compared with the other two breeds when expressed as gּ min-1ּ kg BW-1 (P ≤ 0.001). Smart tags showed that daily eating and ruminating times were longest in Charolais and shortest in Brahman (P < 0.05). In contrast, time spent not active was longest in Brahman and shortest in Charolais (P ≤ 0.001). Daily ‘active’ time was longer and ‘highly active’ shorter in Angus and Brahman compared with Charolais (P < 0.001). Differences in feeding behavior suggest that breed should be considered to predict DMI from RFID and smart ear tag technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.103
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

266 Breed differences in feeding behavior measured by two remote monitoring technologies in feedlot steers

Jillian E M Burgess, L. A. González, Madison M E Luke
Journal of Animal Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

266 Breed differences in feeding behavior measured by two remote monitoring technologies in feedlot steers

Jillian E M Burgess, L. A. González, Madison M E Luke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Estimation of individual dry matter intake (DMI) is required to optimize feed efficiency, carcass endpoint and profitability of feedlot cattle. However, measuring individual DMI is not practical or economically viable in a commercial setting. It is suggested that feeding behavior measured by remote monitoring technologies could be used to predict DMI of feedlot steers in real-time. However, inherent differences between breeds could influence DMI and feeding behavior and therefore these may need to be considered to predict DMI from feeding behavior. The objective of the present study was to assess differences between breeds in DMI and feeding behavior using data collected from radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags linked to electronic feeders and smart ear tags with accelerometers. Twenty-four steers from each breed [Angus, Brahman and Charolais; initial body weight (BW) = 335 ± 25.0 kg/steer) were fed using 10 electronic feeders in a serial slaughter trial for up to 200 d with 50 d slaughter intervals. Data were averaged per animal and ANOVA was performed with fixed effects of breed and length of the feeding period. There was no interaction between breed and length of feeding period (P > 0.05). DMI, feeding time and visit length measured by RFID, were less in Brahman compared with Angus and Charolais steers (P < 0.05). Eating rate (g/min) was not affected by breeds (P > 0.05); however, Brahmans ate faster compared with the other two breeds when expressed as gּ min-1ּ kg BW-1 (P ≤ 0.001). Smart tags showed that daily eating and ruminating times were longest in Charolais and shortest in Brahman (P < 0.05). In contrast, time spent not active was longest in Brahman and shortest in Charolais (P ≤ 0.001). Daily ‘active’ time was longer and ‘highly active’ shorter in Angus and Brahman compared with Charolais (P < 0.001). Differences in feeding behavior suggest that breed should be considered to predict DMI from RFID and smart ear tag technologies.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
The University of Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

266 Breed differences in feeding behavior measured by two remote monitoring technologies in feedlot steers — Jillian E M Burgess, L. A. González, et al. · Journal of Animal Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS