PSLBII-2 Impact of controlled feeding on enteric methane production and animal performance

Abstract The impact ruminants have on environmental sustainability has been of growing concern in recent decades. Many cattle in the northern great plains are fed on family-owned farms and feedlots, highlighting the need for producer-friendly mitigation strategies, such as the established, but not widely adopted management strategy of controlled or precision feeding. The objective of this experiment was to determine the impact of precision feeding on enteric methane (CH4) production and subsequent animal performance. Angus-cross steers [n = 48; body weight (BW) = 447 ± 4.4kg] were blocked by BW and assigned to one of three treatment groups. Treatments consisted of a control (CON) where steers were fed ad libitum, Treatment 1 (TRT1) 96 percent of ad libitum and Treatment 2 (TRT2) 92 percent of ad libitum. TRT1 and TRT2 were adjusted once weekly based on the CON steers average intakes from the previous week. BW was measured on d 0, 1, 28, 56, and 84 and dry matter intake (DMI; kg/d) was measured using an Insentec Roughage Intake Control System (Insentec, Markenesse, The Netherlands). Enteric CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) production was determined utilizing 2 GreenFeed emission measurement systems (AHCS; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD). Only visits greater than 3 min in duration were used for analysis. Average Daily Gain (ADG) and gain to feed (G:F) did not differ among treatments (P = 0.17, P = 0.80, respectively), but ADG had a tendency to decrease (linear; P = 0.09). DMI was greatest for CON and least for TRT2 (P ≤ 0.01). CH4 (g/d) output differed between treatments (P ≤ 0.007). There was a tendency for a quadratic relationship for derived methane yield (MY; g/kg DMI) among treatments (P = 0.10). Emission intensity (EI; g CH4/kg gain) was not different across treatments (P = 0.40). These results suggest precision feeding may have a positive impact on methane emissions but could negatively impact performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.758
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PSLBII-2 Impact of controlled feeding on enteric methane production and animal performance

Carlee M Salisbury, Logan R Thompson, Zachary K Smith
Journal of Animal Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

PSLBII-2 Impact of controlled feeding on enteric methane production and animal performance

Carlee M Salisbury, Logan R Thompson, Zachary K Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract The impact ruminants have on environmental sustainability has been of growing concern in recent decades. Many cattle in the northern great plains are fed on family-owned farms and feedlots, highlighting the need for producer-friendly mitigation strategies, such as the established, but not widely adopted management strategy of controlled or precision feeding. The objective of this experiment was to determine the impact of precision feeding on enteric methane (CH4) production and subsequent animal performance. Angus-cross steers [n = 48; body weight (BW) = 447 ± 4.4kg] were blocked by BW and assigned to one of three treatment groups. Treatments consisted of a control (CON) where steers were fed ad libitum, Treatment 1 (TRT1) 96 percent of ad libitum and Treatment 2 (TRT2) 92 percent of ad libitum. TRT1 and TRT2 were adjusted once weekly based on the CON steers average intakes from the previous week. BW was measured on d 0, 1, 28, 56, and 84 and dry matter intake (DMI; kg/d) was measured using an Insentec Roughage Intake Control System (Insentec, Markenesse, The Netherlands). Enteric CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) production was determined utilizing 2 GreenFeed emission measurement systems (AHCS; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD). Only visits greater than 3 min in duration were used for analysis. Average Daily Gain (ADG) and gain to feed (G:F) did not differ among treatments (P = 0.17, P = 0.80, respectively), but ADG had a tendency to decrease (linear; P = 0.09). DMI was greatest for CON and least for TRT2 (P ≤ 0.01). CH4 (g/d) output differed between treatments (P ≤ 0.007). There was a tendency for a quadratic relationship for derived methane yield (MY; g/kg DMI) among treatments (P = 0.10). Emission intensity (EI; g CH4/kg gain) was not different across treatments (P = 0.40). These results suggest precision feeding may have a positive impact on methane emissions but could negatively impact performance.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 102(Supplement_3)
South Dakota State University (US), Kansas State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.