Prevalence, predictors and outcomes of self-reported feedback for EMS professionals: a mixed-methods diary study

Feedback for EMS professionals was perceived to improve personal wellbeing, professional development and service outcomes. EMS workplaces need to develop a culture that encourages feedback-seeking to strengthen the impact of feedback for EMS professionals on clinical decision-making and staff wellbeing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Emergency Medicine
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01082-y
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence, predictors and outcomes of self-reported feedback for EMS professionals: a mixed-methods diary study

Jonathan Benn, Rebecca Lawton, Gillian Janes, Luke Budworth et al.
4 citations
BMC Emergency Medicine
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
2.76
article

Prevalence, predictors and outcomes of self-reported feedback for EMS professionals: a mixed-methods diary study

Jonathan Benn, Rebecca Lawton, Gillian Janes, Luke Budworth, Caitlin Wilson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Feedback for EMS professionals was perceived to improve personal wellbeing, professional development and service outcomes. EMS workplaces need to develop a culture that encourages feedback-seeking to strengthen the impact of feedback for EMS professionals on clinical decision-making and staff wellbeing.

BMC Emergency MedicineVol. 24(1)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of Leeds (GB), University of Bradford (GB), Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB), Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.