Evaluation of standard concretes containing enhanced-treated fluidized-bed waste incineration bottom ash as manufactured aggregate

Circular economy can reduce natural resource consumption in construction, for instance by using manufactured aggregate from municipal solid waste fluidized-bed incineration bottom ashes instead of solely natural aggregates. The use of aggregate from this ash type in concrete is little investigated, particularly if it is derived from industrial-scale enhanced bottom ash treatment. This study presents an environmental and technical evaluation of concretes containing manufactured aggregate produced on industrial-scale from two Austrian fluidized-bed incineration bottom ashes. The results of the chemical analysis show that the manufactured aggregates complied with all limit values, with the exception of sulfate, which was 3215 mg/kg for the first and 3260 mg/kg for the second bottom ash. These values were higher than the lower limit value of 3000 mg/kg, but much lower than the higher limit value of 5,000 mg/kg. Then, concrete mixtures containing 12 and 20 wt% of manufactured aggregate were produced and evaluated. Two of the four concretes produced complied with all technical criteria for standard concrete C25/30. The compressive strength of all concretes was with 34.1–39.7 N/mm² higher than the limit value of 30.0 N/mm². One concrete showed alkali-silica reaction, while the particle size distribution of another concrete was out of the desired range. The crushed concretes were then analyzed with respect to environmental criteria for recycling material from demolition waste. These criteria were met by the concrete mixtures containing manufactured aggregate from the second bottom ash. By reducing the manufactured aggregate content in concrete from 12 wt% to 10 wt%, also the concretes with the first bottom ash should meet all criteria. Circular economy of fluidized bed waste incineration bottom ash mineral fraction by producing a secondary raw material for manufactured aggregate in concrete. • Concretes containing fluidized bed incineration bottom ash were produced. • Concretes were tested for their environmental and technical parameters. • Two out of four concretes achieved the legal and technical limit values. • Two out of four concretes achieved the environmental limit values. • With 10 wt% of bottom ash in concrete, all requirements can be met.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03759
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of standard concretes containing enhanced-treated fluidized-bed waste incineration bottom ash as manufactured aggregate

Julia Mühl, Konrad Bergmeister, Oliver Zeman, Jakob Lederer et al.
1 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
0.27
article

Evaluation of standard concretes containing enhanced-treated fluidized-bed waste incineration bottom ash as manufactured aggregate

Julia Mühl, Konrad Bergmeister, Oliver Zeman, Jakob Lederer, Johannes Hron, Felix Feher, Simon Mika
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Circular economy can reduce natural resource consumption in construction, for instance by using manufactured aggregate from municipal solid waste fluidized-bed incineration bottom ashes instead of solely natural aggregates. The use of aggregate from this ash type in concrete is little investigated, particularly if it is derived from industrial-scale enhanced bottom ash treatment. This study presents an environmental and technical evaluation of concretes containing manufactured aggregate produced on industrial-scale from two Austrian fluidized-bed incineration bottom ashes. The results of the chemical analysis show that the manufactured aggregates complied with all limit values, with the exception of sulfate, which was 3215 mg/kg for the first and 3260 mg/kg for the second bottom ash. These values were higher than the lower limit value of 3000 mg/kg, but much lower than the higher limit value of 5,000 mg/kg. Then, concrete mixtures containing 12 and 20 wt% of manufactured aggregate were produced and evaluated. Two of the four concretes produced complied with all technical criteria for standard concrete C25/30. The compressive strength of all concretes was with 34.1–39.7 N/mm² higher than the limit value of 30.0 N/mm². One concrete showed alkali-silica reaction, while the particle size distribution of another concrete was out of the desired range. The crushed concretes were then analyzed with respect to environmental criteria for recycling material from demolition waste. These criteria were met by the concrete mixtures containing manufactured aggregate from the second bottom ash. By reducing the manufactured aggregate content in concrete from 12 wt% to 10 wt%, also the concretes with the first bottom ash should meet all criteria. Circular economy of fluidized bed waste incineration bottom ash mineral fraction by producing a secondary raw material for manufactured aggregate in concrete. • Concretes containing fluidized bed incineration bottom ash were produced. • Concretes were tested for their environmental and technical parameters. • Two out of four concretes achieved the legal and technical limit values. • Two out of four concretes achieved the environmental limit values. • With 10 wt% of bottom ash in concrete, all requirements can be met.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 21
TU Wien (AT), Christian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity (AT), BOKU University (AT)
Christian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft, Technische Universität Wien Bibliothek
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.