Material Characterisation of 19–20th Century Manuscripts from Northern Thailand
Abstract Material analysis was carried out on four manuscripts from Northern Thailand, which included two palm-leaf manuscripts and two paper manuscripts. The two palm-leaf manuscripts MS 6 and MS 7 were found to have been written in the traditional method, wherein text was incised on the surface of the leaves, and then soot applied to the surfaces, confirmed by the identification of carbon ink. MS 7 additionally showed the presence of trace levels of iron in the ink, either from soot paste or from the stylus used for inscribing. The paper manuscript MS 3 was written in iron-gall ink, with sections written using a methyl-violet based ink while MS 4 was written in carbon ink. The paper used in the case of MS 3 was found to be machine made, while khoi fibres ( Streblus asper ) were used for making the paper used for MS 4. A combination of traditional and modern pigments, like molybdenum orange, was used for decorating the edges and cover. The results improved our understanding of these manuscripts in particular, and also provided us with insights about the rapid adoption of modern materials and their incorporation into the production of written artefacts from Northern Thailand in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Authors
- Agnieszka Helman-Ważny (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1525-767X)
- Olivier Bonnerot (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8196-4992)
- Claudia Colini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8760-2498)
- Peera Panarut
- Sowmeya Sathiyamani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2732-6986)
- Sean Ngiam
- Silpsupa Jaengsawang
Institutions
- Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing (DE)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- University of Warsaw (PL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Restaurator International Journal for the Preservation of Library and Archival Material
- Published
- 2024-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1515/res-2023-0028
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.77
Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Universität Hamburg