Improving the performance of agricultural temporary water markets: The role of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies

Water markets are increasingly advocated for combating agricultural water scarcity. However, in developing countries’ arid and semiarid regions, water market performance is greatly weakened by the insufficient demand-side and supply-side driving forces stemming from farmers’ limited awareness and capacity. Building an agent-based model and taking Hami City, Xinjiang in northwestern China as the case study area, this study explores the roles of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies in adjusting market driving forces and promoting the performance of agricultural temporary water markets. The results show that, without government support, water transactions are limited to only 8.054×10 3 m 3 , which can hardly protect agricultural interests. However, with improved market driving forces, water transactions can be substantially increased—potentially exceeding 100×10 3 m 3 —by technology-based and transaction-based subsidies This effect is particularly evident when the technology-based subsidy induces water shortages for recipients (e.g., retrieve 5820 m 3 /ha water entitlements) and its acceptance rate is below 50 %, and when the transaction-based subsidy approaches the average opportunity costs of selling water for traditional irrigation farmers (0.462 RMB/m 3 ). Combinations of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies prove to be more cost-effective in improving water market performance and protecting agricultural benefits, owing to the enhanced market driving forces and the promoting effect of transaction-based subsidies on the implementation of technology-based subsidies. This promoting effect also helps to alleviate fiscal burdens. Furthermore, results indicate that irrigation technology promotion and water markets are complementary, and their dynamic interaction can facilitate the gradual transformation of irrigation practices in arid and semiarid regions of developing countries. • Role of technology- and transaction-based subsidies in improving water market performance was analyzed. • An agent-based model was built to analyze subsidies’ effects and water market performance. • Transaction-based subsidies can promote the implementation of technology-based subsidies. • Combinations of the two subsidies can achieve higher agricultural benefits with less fiscal expenditure. • Irrigation technology promotion and water market development are complementary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109062
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the performance of agricultural temporary water markets: The role of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies

Minghao Bai, Shenbei Zhou, Yeqing Duan, Jiangping He
3 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Water resources management and optimization
1.01
article

Improving the performance of agricultural temporary water markets: The role of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies

Minghao Bai, Shenbei Zhou, Yeqing Duan, Jiangping He
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Water markets are increasingly advocated for combating agricultural water scarcity. However, in developing countries’ arid and semiarid regions, water market performance is greatly weakened by the insufficient demand-side and supply-side driving forces stemming from farmers’ limited awareness and capacity. Building an agent-based model and taking Hami City, Xinjiang in northwestern China as the case study area, this study explores the roles of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies in adjusting market driving forces and promoting the performance of agricultural temporary water markets. The results show that, without government support, water transactions are limited to only 8.054×10 3 m 3 , which can hardly protect agricultural interests. However, with improved market driving forces, water transactions can be substantially increased—potentially exceeding 100×10 3 m 3 —by technology-based and transaction-based subsidies This effect is particularly evident when the technology-based subsidy induces water shortages for recipients (e.g., retrieve 5820 m 3 /ha water entitlements) and its acceptance rate is below 50 %, and when the transaction-based subsidy approaches the average opportunity costs of selling water for traditional irrigation farmers (0.462 RMB/m 3 ). Combinations of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies prove to be more cost-effective in improving water market performance and protecting agricultural benefits, owing to the enhanced market driving forces and the promoting effect of transaction-based subsidies on the implementation of technology-based subsidies. This promoting effect also helps to alleviate fiscal burdens. Furthermore, results indicate that irrigation technology promotion and water markets are complementary, and their dynamic interaction can facilitate the gradual transformation of irrigation practices in arid and semiarid regions of developing countries. • Role of technology- and transaction-based subsidies in improving water market performance was analyzed. • An agent-based model was built to analyze subsidies’ effects and water market performance. • Transaction-based subsidies can promote the implementation of technology-based subsidies. • Combinations of the two subsidies can achieve higher agricultural benefits with less fiscal expenditure. • Irrigation technology promotion and water market development are complementary.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 303
George Mason University (US), Hohai University (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN)
National University's Basic Research Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Water resources management and optimization
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.