A comparative study on the thermomechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites incorporating single, mixed, and hybrid nanofillers

Abstract A comparative analysis was conducted among nanocomposites fabricated using pristine multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe 3 O 4 ), MWCNT/Fe 3 O 4 hybrid nanofillers, and a mixture of MWCNTs and Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles with varying nanofiller contents. MWCNT/Fe 3 O 4 hybrid nanofillers with significant magnetic properties were synthesized using a chemical coating method to reinforce the epoxy polymer. Characterization techniques, including transmission electron microscopy, energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, confirmed the successful attachment of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles onto MWCNTs. Various solvents and sonication parameters were employed to improve the dispersion quality of nanofillers within the epoxy matrix, and their collective impact on the thermomechanical properties of nanocomposites was investigated. The results showed that nanocomposites containing MWCNT/Fe 3 O 4 hybrid nanofillers dispersed using chloroform and optimized sonication parameters exhibited 5%, 9%, 32%, and 46% improvements in tensile strength and 11%, 20%, 38%, and 50% improvements in elastic modulus compared to those fabricated with mixed nanofillers, pristine MWCNTs, Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, and the neat epoxy, respectively. These nanocomposites also experienced considerable enhancements in thermal stability parameters. Field‐emission scanning electron microscopy was also used to evaluate the dispersion quality and failure mechanisms. The results of this study can be applied in industries that require controllable magnetic properties. Highlights Confirmed successful attachment of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles onto MWCNTs. Sonication parameters considerably affected thermomechanical properties. Chloroform showed the highest improvement in thermomechanical properties. The improvements were due to the high dispersion quality assessed by FESEM. Hybrid nanofillers showed superior properties than single and mixed fillers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.29003
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study on the thermomechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites incorporating single, mixed, and hybrid nanofillers

Yousef Ghanbari, Hadi Khoramishad, Amir Reza Fatolahi, Lucas F. M. da Silva
6 citations
Polymer Composites
Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
1.01
article

A comparative study on the thermomechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites incorporating single, mixed, and hybrid nanofillers

Yousef Ghanbari, Hadi Khoramishad, Amir Reza Fatolahi, Lucas F. M. da Silva
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract A comparative analysis was conducted among nanocomposites fabricated using pristine multi‐walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe 3 O 4 ), MWCNT/Fe 3 O 4 hybrid nanofillers, and a mixture of MWCNTs and Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles with varying nanofiller contents. MWCNT/Fe 3 O 4 hybrid nanofillers with significant magnetic properties were synthesized using a chemical coating method to reinforce the epoxy polymer. Characterization techniques, including transmission electron microscopy, energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, confirmed the successful attachment of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles onto MWCNTs. Various solvents and sonication parameters were employed to improve the dispersion quality of nanofillers within the epoxy matrix, and their collective impact on the thermomechanical properties of nanocomposites was investigated. The results showed that nanocomposites containing MWCNT/Fe 3 O 4 hybrid nanofillers dispersed using chloroform and optimized sonication parameters exhibited 5%, 9%, 32%, and 46% improvements in tensile strength and 11%, 20%, 38%, and 50% improvements in elastic modulus compared to those fabricated with mixed nanofillers, pristine MWCNTs, Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, and the neat epoxy, respectively. These nanocomposites also experienced considerable enhancements in thermal stability parameters. Field‐emission scanning electron microscopy was also used to evaluate the dispersion quality and failure mechanisms. The results of this study can be applied in industries that require controllable magnetic properties. Highlights Confirmed successful attachment of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles onto MWCNTs. Sonication parameters considerably affected thermomechanical properties. Chloroform showed the highest improvement in thermomechanical properties. The improvements were due to the high dispersion quality assessed by FESEM. Hybrid nanofillers showed superior properties than single and mixed fillers.

Polymer CompositesVol. 46(1)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Mangement (PT), Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.