Monolithic Chinese political culture?: A cross‐regional exploration

Abstract Objective This article explores whether authoritarian China has a monolithic political culture, or rather a set of somewhat different political cultures across a number of regions. Method On the basis of several criteria we deem particularly important for identifying regions within which development, communication, and socialization of political attitudes are likely to be internally common but distinguishable from those of other regions, we divide China into six such regions. We then employ a combination of eight attitudinal measures from The China Survey of 2008 which are directly relevant to discerning political culture. Results We find that there are indeed substantively different cultures across regions, some of which are more consistent with elite preferences than others. Conclusion From our initial foray into possible explanation, we conclude that politico‐historical legacy—sometimes in interaction with certain aspects of geographic, demographic, and economic characteristics—may go furthest in explaining the cross‐region cultural differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13445
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monolithic Chinese political culture?: A cross‐regional exploration

Yao‐Yuan Yeh, Zhaoqing Li, Robert Harmel, Shen Chen
2 citations
Social Science Quarterly
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
3.42
article

Monolithic Chinese political culture?: A cross‐regional exploration

Yao‐Yuan Yeh, Zhaoqing Li, Robert Harmel, Shen Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective This article explores whether authoritarian China has a monolithic political culture, or rather a set of somewhat different political cultures across a number of regions. Method On the basis of several criteria we deem particularly important for identifying regions within which development, communication, and socialization of political attitudes are likely to be internally common but distinguishable from those of other regions, we divide China into six such regions. We then employ a combination of eight attitudinal measures from The China Survey of 2008 which are directly relevant to discerning political culture. Results We find that there are indeed substantively different cultures across regions, some of which are more consistent with elite preferences than others. Conclusion From our initial foray into possible explanation, we conclude that politico‐historical legacy—sometimes in interaction with certain aspects of geographic, demographic, and economic characteristics—may go furthest in explaining the cross‐region cultural differences.

Social Science Quarterly
University of St. Thomas - Texas (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
3.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monolithic Chinese political culture?: A cross‐regional exploration — Yao‐Yuan Yeh, Zhaoqing Li, et al. · Social Science Quarterly (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS