Refining and expanding applications of Moral Foundations Theory in consumer psychology

Abstract We set forth an agenda for Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) research in consumer psychology, focusing in particular on four pathways: (1) factoring in multiple identities, including moral identities, to account for contextual elevation or suppression of moral foundations in predicting which decisions consumers moralize and when ; (2) broadening the methodological usage of MFT to include more targeted causal research as well as expanding the utility of correlational research; (3) increasing discriminant validity between MFT and other constructs by studying moral foundations as individually manipulable and focusing on their incremental predictive validity over and above demographics and related constructs; and (4) recognizing that researcher biases regarding morality can leak into the publication process, necessitating clear distinctions between prescriptive versus descriptive research. These pathways facilitate more precise and stronger predictive validity for applying MFT in consumer psychology, yielding greater theoretical and practical utility across researcher perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consumer Psychology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1442
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining and expanding applications of Moral Foundations Theory in consumer psychology

Eric M. VanEpps, Wayne Johnson, Guilherme Ramos, Jesse Graham
3 citations
Journal of Consumer Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.03
article

Refining and expanding applications of Moral Foundations Theory in consumer psychology

Eric M. VanEpps, Wayne Johnson, Guilherme Ramos, Jesse Graham
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We set forth an agenda for Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) research in consumer psychology, focusing in particular on four pathways: (1) factoring in multiple identities, including moral identities, to account for contextual elevation or suppression of moral foundations in predicting which decisions consumers moralize and when ; (2) broadening the methodological usage of MFT to include more targeted causal research as well as expanding the utility of correlational research; (3) increasing discriminant validity between MFT and other constructs by studying moral foundations as individually manipulable and focusing on their incremental predictive validity over and above demographics and related constructs; and (4) recognizing that researcher biases regarding morality can leak into the publication process, necessitating clear distinctions between prescriptive versus descriptive research. These pathways facilitate more precise and stronger predictive validity for applying MFT in consumer psychology, yielding greater theoretical and practical utility across researcher perspectives.

Journal of Consumer PsychologyVol. 34(4)
Vanderbilt University (US), University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Refining and expanding applications of Moral Foundations Theory in consumer psychology — Eric M. VanEpps, Wayne Johnson, et al. · Journal of Consumer Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS