Ways of not seeing: visibility, blindness, and the transparency game

Purpose To advance understanding of transparency by problematising the motivations and strategies of a so far underexplored group: its users. Design/methodology/approach We explore the relationship between blindness, visibility, and transparency by drawing on our analysis of Max Frisch’s experimental novel Gantenbein (1964), in which the protagonist lives a life of feigned blindness. Findings The accounting scholarly debate on transparency has neglected the users of transparency. We address this through a novel theorisation of transparency as a game, highlighting some of its distinctive features and paradoxes. Originality/value By theorising the transparency game we move beyond concerns with what transparency reveals or conceals and conceptualise the motivations and strategies of the players engaged in this game. We show how different players have something to gain from the transparency game and warn of its emancipatory limits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-05-2023-6458
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ways of not seeing: visibility, blindness, and the transparency game

Jonathan Tweedie, Matteo Ronzani
3 citations
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Accounting and Organizational Management
1.59
article

Ways of not seeing: visibility, blindness, and the transparency game

Jonathan Tweedie, Matteo Ronzani
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose To advance understanding of transparency by problematising the motivations and strategies of a so far underexplored group: its users. Design/methodology/approach We explore the relationship between blindness, visibility, and transparency by drawing on our analysis of Max Frisch’s experimental novel Gantenbein (1964), in which the protagonist lives a life of feigned blindness. Findings The accounting scholarly debate on transparency has neglected the users of transparency. We address this through a novel theorisation of transparency as a game, highlighting some of its distinctive features and paradoxes. Originality/value By theorising the transparency game we move beyond concerns with what transparency reveals or conceals and conceptualise the motivations and strategies of the players engaged in this game. We show how different players have something to gain from the transparency game and warn of its emancipatory limits.

Accounting Auditing & Accountability JournalVol. 38(4)
University of Manchester (GB), Manchester University (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Accounting and Organizational Management
1.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ways of not seeing: visibility, blindness, and the transparency game — Jonathan Tweedie, Matteo Ronzani · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS