COOPERATIVE STRATEGY OF IMAGE-BUILDING IN ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN CONVERSATIONAL DISCOURSE

The article discusses tactics of image-building as a cooperative strategy in English and Russian conversational discourse. The strategy in question is realized through its two variants – self-presentation and enhancing the status of the communicative partner. The tactics of self-presentation are as follows: positive and negative self-characterization, appealing to the third party’s opinion and self-irony, whereas enhancing the status of the communicative partner is actualized through the tactics of interlocutor’s positive characterization, engagement demonstration, appealing to the interlocutor’s expertise and change of the topic. The differences in tactics usage can be explained through linguoculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of Polotsk State University Series A Humanity sciences
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52928/2070-1608-2024-72-4-101-105
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COOPERATIVE STRATEGY OF IMAGE-BUILDING IN ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN CONVERSATIONAL DISCOURSE

A. IVANOU
1 citations
Herald of Polotsk State University Series A Humanity sciences
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
4.29
article

COOPERATIVE STRATEGY OF IMAGE-BUILDING IN ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN CONVERSATIONAL DISCOURSE

A. IVANOU
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article discusses tactics of image-building as a cooperative strategy in English and Russian conversational discourse. The strategy in question is realized through its two variants – self-presentation and enhancing the status of the communicative partner. The tactics of self-presentation are as follows: positive and negative self-characterization, appealing to the third party’s opinion and self-irony, whereas enhancing the status of the communicative partner is actualized through the tactics of interlocutor’s positive characterization, engagement demonstration, appealing to the interlocutor’s expertise and change of the topic. The differences in tactics usage can be explained through linguoculture.

Herald of Polotsk State University Series A Humanity sciences(4)
Minsk State Linguistic University (BY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.