Analysis of two handwritten digit recognition methods based on neural network

In the field of image recognition, Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Fully connected neural networks (FCNNs) are two commonly used deep learning models. For the handwritten digit recognition task, the researchers compared the performance of the two methods on the MNIST dataset. The performance of these models of two neural networks performing the same task on the same dataset will be included in this article. In this paper, the construction and operation process of a fully connected neural network and convolutional neural network are theoretically analyzed. The researchers used the MNIST handwritten digits dataset for their study. The results show that the convolutional neural network is superior to the fully connected neural network in recognition accuracy and time consumption. This is mainly attributed to the advantages of convolutional neural networks that can better retain spatial structure information, reduce the number of parameters, and share weights when processing image data. In contrast, fully connected neural networks need to process many parameters, and is difficult to effectively extract image features. Therefore, when using the MNIST dataset as an image recognition task, researchers believe that using convolutional neural networks is a more effective and efficient method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3037994
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of two handwritten digit recognition methods based on neural network

Shisheng Yang
1 citations
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
0.25
article

Analysis of two handwritten digit recognition methods based on neural network

Shisheng Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the field of image recognition, Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Fully connected neural networks (FCNNs) are two commonly used deep learning models. For the handwritten digit recognition task, the researchers compared the performance of the two methods on the MNIST dataset. The performance of these models of two neural networks performing the same task on the same dataset will be included in this article. In this paper, the construction and operation process of a fully connected neural network and convolutional neural network are theoretically analyzed. The researchers used the MNIST handwritten digits dataset for their study. The results show that the convolutional neural network is superior to the fully connected neural network in recognition accuracy and time consumption. This is mainly attributed to the advantages of convolutional neural networks that can better retain spatial structure information, reduce the number of parameters, and share weights when processing image data. In contrast, fully connected neural networks need to process many parameters, and is difficult to effectively extract image features. Therefore, when using the MNIST dataset as an image recognition task, researchers believe that using convolutional neural networks is a more effective and efficient method.

Hubei University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.