Investment and Financing Decisions for Fuel Consumption Reduction in a Vehicle Supply Chain

This paper models the financing and fuel reduction investment decisions of a supply chain under chain and chain competition to analyze firms’ pricing, product, and investment and financing strategies. In two competing supply chains, one of them is willing to invest in fuel consumption reduction to meet its carbon social responsibility and pursue a competitive. It can choose between two financing models, manufacturer financing and retailer financing, to address the lack of investment capital. Consumers are inclined to purchase low-fuel consumption vehicles due to the cost of use and carbon concerns. Results show that under the model of manufacturer financing, the utility of both the manufacturer and the retailer improves. However, in this model, the fuel consumption reduction is lower than that under the model of retailer financing. If it takes the model of retailer financing, the manufacturer can achieve higher utility than under the model of manufacturer financing, but the retailer’s profits fall rather than increase. So the retailer would not take it unless the manufacturer and government compensate it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Game Theory Review
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219198924500166
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investment and Financing Decisions for Fuel Consumption Reduction in a Vehicle Supply Chain

Yongxi Yi, J Chen, Meng Zhang, Yu Li
International Game Theory Review
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Investment and Financing Decisions for Fuel Consumption Reduction in a Vehicle Supply Chain

Yongxi Yi, J Chen, Meng Zhang, Yu Li
article en

Abstract

This paper models the financing and fuel reduction investment decisions of a supply chain under chain and chain competition to analyze firms’ pricing, product, and investment and financing strategies. In two competing supply chains, one of them is willing to invest in fuel consumption reduction to meet its carbon social responsibility and pursue a competitive. It can choose between two financing models, manufacturer financing and retailer financing, to address the lack of investment capital. Consumers are inclined to purchase low-fuel consumption vehicles due to the cost of use and carbon concerns. Results show that under the model of manufacturer financing, the utility of both the manufacturer and the retailer improves. However, in this model, the fuel consumption reduction is lower than that under the model of retailer financing. If it takes the model of retailer financing, the manufacturer can achieve higher utility than under the model of manufacturer financing, but the retailer’s profits fall rather than increase. So the retailer would not take it unless the manufacturer and government compensate it.

International Game Theory ReviewVol. 28(01)
Hengyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), University of South China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Hunan Office of Philosophy and Social Science
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.