Behavior-based optimal refund policy under advance selling: an analysis of the impact of loss fairness concerns

Buying and returning products can result in losses for both transaction parties, and a partial refund policy affects the loss difference. If consumers feel the policy is unfair, they can easily trigger their inequity aversion to loss. This study analyzes the effects of consumers’ loss fairness concerns on a two-period partial refund policy in advance selling. We develop a mathematical framework in which a firm sells products to consumers in advance, and consumers decide when to buy. The firm allows pre-purchased consumers to return the products in the spot period, resulting in potential losses for both parties. Considering fair-minded consumers, we first show how the firm responds to loss fairness concerns to make an optimal partial refund policy. We then discuss whether the firm is affected by loss fairness concerns. We find that when the degree of fairness concern exceeds a certain threshold, consumers’ loss fairness concerns negatively affect the firm. Besides, we propose a fairness-mitigating mechanism to relieve the negative effect on the firm, which might benefit both parties. Our analysis and results first provide management insights into the importance of incorporating loss fairness concerns in advance selling and the influence on partial refund policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2024.2396955
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavior-based optimal refund policy under advance selling: an analysis of the impact of loss fairness concerns

Stephen Shaoyi Liao, Tengfei Nie, Shaofu Du, Yuan Chen
5 citations
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
2.64
article

Behavior-based optimal refund policy under advance selling: an analysis of the impact of loss fairness concerns

Stephen Shaoyi Liao, Tengfei Nie, Shaofu Du, Yuan Chen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Buying and returning products can result in losses for both transaction parties, and a partial refund policy affects the loss difference. If consumers feel the policy is unfair, they can easily trigger their inequity aversion to loss. This study analyzes the effects of consumers’ loss fairness concerns on a two-period partial refund policy in advance selling. We develop a mathematical framework in which a firm sells products to consumers in advance, and consumers decide when to buy. The firm allows pre-purchased consumers to return the products in the spot period, resulting in potential losses for both parties. Considering fair-minded consumers, we first show how the firm responds to loss fairness concerns to make an optimal partial refund policy. We then discuss whether the firm is affected by loss fairness concerns. We find that when the degree of fairness concern exceeds a certain threshold, consumers’ loss fairness concerns negatively affect the firm. Besides, we propose a fairness-mitigating mechanism to relieve the negative effect on the firm, which might benefit both parties. Our analysis and results first provide management insights into the importance of incorporating loss fairness concerns in advance selling and the influence on partial refund policy.

Journal of the Operational Research SocietyVol. 76(4)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Shandong University (CN), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Guangdong University Of Finances and Economics (CN), University of Finance and Economics (MN), Guangdong University of Finance (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
2.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.