Measuring E-Learning Antecedents in The Context of Higher Education through Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

The aim of this study is to develop a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the e-learning antecedents through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The questionnaire used in this study was adapted and modified using a 7-point Likert scale and validated by eight e-learning experts. A pilot test with 102 responses was conducted using a cross-sectional design, and the data were analyzed using EFA in SPSS version 29. The results showed that the factor loadings for all construct items exceeded the threshold of 0.5. Furthermore, Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant (p < .001), and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure for sampling adequacy was 0.896, indicating an excellent sample size. Subsequently, 1,092 responses from the field study were analyzed using CFA with AMOS version 28. The results confirmed that the instrument met all CFA criteria, demonstrating its robust reliability in assessing the e-learning antecedents in the context of higher education. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by offering a comprehensive overview of the EFA and CFA methodologies, leading to the development of a reliable measurement. Finally, it recommends that future research employ alternative analytical tools to evaluate the instruments used in this study and compare the findings with the conclusions drawn.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i9/22670
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring E-Learning Antecedents in The Context of Higher Education through Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Juhaini Jabar, Mohamad Aidil Hasim, Vincent Woo Ming Wei
6 citations
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
6.31
article

Measuring E-Learning Antecedents in The Context of Higher Education through Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Juhaini Jabar, Mohamad Aidil Hasim, Vincent Woo Ming Wei
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the e-learning antecedents through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The questionnaire used in this study was adapted and modified using a 7-point Likert scale and validated by eight e-learning experts. A pilot test with 102 responses was conducted using a cross-sectional design, and the data were analyzed using EFA in SPSS version 29. The results showed that the factor loadings for all construct items exceeded the threshold of 0.5. Furthermore, Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant (p < .001), and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure for sampling adequacy was 0.896, indicating an excellent sample size. Subsequently, 1,092 responses from the field study were analyzed using CFA with AMOS version 28. The results confirmed that the instrument met all CFA criteria, demonstrating its robust reliability in assessing the e-learning antecedents in the context of higher education. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by offering a comprehensive overview of the EFA and CFA methodologies, leading to the development of a reliable measurement. Finally, it recommends that future research employ alternative analytical tools to evaluate the instruments used in this study and compare the findings with the conclusions drawn.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 14(9)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
6.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.