Comprehensive comparison between vision transformers and convolutional neural networks for face recognition tasks

This paper presents a comprehensive comparison between Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks for face recognition related tasks, including extensive experiments on the tasks of face identification and verification. Our study focuses on six state-of-the-art models: EfficientNet, Inception, MobileNet, ResNet, VGG, and Vision Transformers. Our evaluation of these models is based on five diverse datasets: Labeled Faces in the Wild, Real World Occluded Faces, Surveillance Cameras Face, UPM-GTI-Face, and VGG Face 2. These datasets present unique challenges regarding people diversity, distance from the camera, and face occlusions such as those produced by masks and glasses. Our contribution to the field includes a deep analysis of the experimental results, including a thorough examination of the training and evaluation process, as well as the software and hardware configurations used. Our results show that Vision Transformers outperform Convolutional Neural Networks in terms of accuracy and robustness against distance and occlusions for face recognition related tasks, while also presenting a smaller memory footprint and an impressive inference speed, rivaling even the fastest Convolutional Neural Networks. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the performance of Vision Transformers for face recognition related tasks and highlights the potential of these models as a more efficient solution than Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72254-w
Citations
37
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive comparison between vision transformers and convolutional neural networks for face recognition tasks

Carlos Cuevas, Narciso Garcı́a, Marcos Rodrigo
37 citations
Scientific Reports
Face recognition and analysis
9.22
article

Comprehensive comparison between vision transformers and convolutional neural networks for face recognition tasks

Carlos Cuevas, Narciso Garcı́a, Marcos Rodrigo
article en
37 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparison between Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks for face recognition related tasks, including extensive experiments on the tasks of face identification and verification. Our study focuses on six state-of-the-art models: EfficientNet, Inception, MobileNet, ResNet, VGG, and Vision Transformers. Our evaluation of these models is based on five diverse datasets: Labeled Faces in the Wild, Real World Occluded Faces, Surveillance Cameras Face, UPM-GTI-Face, and VGG Face 2. These datasets present unique challenges regarding people diversity, distance from the camera, and face occlusions such as those produced by masks and glasses. Our contribution to the field includes a deep analysis of the experimental results, including a thorough examination of the training and evaluation process, as well as the software and hardware configurations used. Our results show that Vision Transformers outperform Convolutional Neural Networks in terms of accuracy and robustness against distance and occlusions for face recognition related tasks, while also presenting a smaller memory footprint and an impressive inference speed, rivaling even the fastest Convolutional Neural Networks. In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the performance of Vision Transformers for face recognition related tasks and highlights the potential of these models as a more efficient solution than Convolutional Neural Networks.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Face recognition and analysis
9.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.