Estimating Forest Gross Primary Production Using Machine Learning, Light Use Efficiency Model, and Global Eddy Covariance Data

Forests play a vital role in atmospheric CO2 sequestration among terrestrial ecosystems, mitigating the greenhouse effect induced by human activity in a changing climate. The LUE (light use efficiency) model is a popular algorithm for calculating terrestrial GPP (gross primary production) based on physiological mechanisms and is easy to implement. Different versions have been applied for many years to simulate the GPP of different ecosystem types at regional or global scales. For estimating forest GPP using different approaches, we implemented five LUE models (EC-LUE, VPM, GOL-PEM, CASA, and C-Fix) in forests of type DBF, EBF, ENF, and MF, using the FLUXNET2015 dataset, remote sensing observations, and Köppen–Geiger climate zones. We then fused these models to additionally improve the ability of the GPP estimation using an RF (random forest) and an SVM (support vector machine). Our results indicated that under a unified parameterization scheme, EC-LUE and VPM yielded the best performance in simulating GPP variations, followed by GLO-PEM, CASA, and C-fix, while MODIS also demonstrated reliable GPP estimation ability. The results of the model fusion across different forest types and flux net sites indicated that the RF could capture more GPP variation magnitudes with higher R2 and lower RMSE than the SVM. Both RF and SVM were validated using cross-validation for all forest types and flux net sites, showing that the accuracy of the GPP simulation could be improved by the RF and SVM by 28% and 27%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091615
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Forest Gross Primary Production Using Machine Learning, Light Use Efficiency Model, and Global Eddy Covariance Data

Qin Zhang, Chuixiang Yi, Nir Y. Krakauer, Yingying Fu et al.
3 citations
Forests
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
0.85
article

Estimating Forest Gross Primary Production Using Machine Learning, Light Use Efficiency Model, and Global Eddy Covariance Data

Qin Zhang, Chuixiang Yi, Nir Y. Krakauer, Yingying Fu, Eric Kutter, Zhenkun Tian, Tao Zhou
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Forests play a vital role in atmospheric CO2 sequestration among terrestrial ecosystems, mitigating the greenhouse effect induced by human activity in a changing climate. The LUE (light use efficiency) model is a popular algorithm for calculating terrestrial GPP (gross primary production) based on physiological mechanisms and is easy to implement. Different versions have been applied for many years to simulate the GPP of different ecosystem types at regional or global scales. For estimating forest GPP using different approaches, we implemented five LUE models (EC-LUE, VPM, GOL-PEM, CASA, and C-Fix) in forests of type DBF, EBF, ENF, and MF, using the FLUXNET2015 dataset, remote sensing observations, and Köppen–Geiger climate zones. We then fused these models to additionally improve the ability of the GPP estimation using an RF (random forest) and an SVM (support vector machine). Our results indicated that under a unified parameterization scheme, EC-LUE and VPM yielded the best performance in simulating GPP variations, followed by GLO-PEM, CASA, and C-fix, while MODIS also demonstrated reliable GPP estimation ability. The results of the model fusion across different forest types and flux net sites indicated that the RF could capture more GPP variation magnitudes with higher R2 and lower RMSE than the SVM. Both RF and SVM were validated using cross-validation for all forest types and flux net sites, showing that the accuracy of the GPP simulation could be improved by the RF and SVM by 28% and 27%.

ForestsVol. 15(9)
Queens College, CUNY (US), The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), City College of New York (US), China University of Labor Relations (CN), City University of New York (US), Beijing Technology and Business University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Dalian University of Technology (CN)
National Bureau of Statistics of China, Beijing Technology and Business University, China University of Labor Relations
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.