Difficulties in Perceiving and Understanding Robot Reliability Changes in a Sequential Binary Task

Human-robot teams push the boundaries of what both humans and robots can accomplish. In order for the team to function well, the human must accurately assess the robot’s capabilities to calibrate the trust between the human and robot. In this paper, we use virtual reality (VR), a widely accepted tool in studying human-robot interaction (HRI), to study human behaviors affecting their detection and understanding of changes in a simulated robot’s reliability. We present a human-subject study to see how different reliability change factors may affect this process. Our results demonstrate that participants make judgements about robot reliability before they have accumulated sufficient evidence to make objectively high-confidence inferences about robot reliability. We show that this reliability change observation behavior diverges from behavior expectations based on the probability distribution functions used to describe observation outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3677386.3682083
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Difficulties in Perceiving and Understanding Robot Reliability Changes in a Sequential Binary Task

Greg Welch, Hiroshi Furuya, Zubin Choudhary, Matt Gottsacker et al.
2 citations
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
article

Difficulties in Perceiving and Understanding Robot Reliability Changes in a Sequential Binary Task

Greg Welch, Hiroshi Furuya, Zubin Choudhary, Matt Gottsacker, Gerd Bruder, Laura Battistel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Human-robot teams push the boundaries of what both humans and robots can accomplish. In order for the team to function well, the human must accurately assess the robot’s capabilities to calibrate the trust between the human and robot. In this paper, we use virtual reality (VR), a widely accepted tool in studying human-robot interaction (HRI), to study human behaviors affecting their detection and understanding of changes in a simulated robot’s reliability. We present a human-subject study to see how different reliability change factors may affect this process. Our results demonstrate that participants make judgements about robot reliability before they have accumulated sufficient evidence to make objectively high-confidence inferences about robot reliability. We show that this reliability change observation behavior diverges from behavior expectations based on the probability distribution functions used to describe observation outcomes.

University of Central Florida (US), University of Trento (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Difficulties in Perceiving and Understanding Robot Reliability Changes in a Sequential Binary Task — Greg Welch, Hiroshi Furuya, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS