Revisiting the “East African Paradox”: CMIP6 Models Also Struggle to Reproduce Strong Observed Long Rain Drying Trends

Abstract Societies in much of the Horn of Africa are affected by variability in two distinct rainy seasons: the March–May (MAM) “long” rains and the October–December (OND) “short” rains. A recent five-season, La Niña–forced drought has renewed concerns about possible anthropogenic drying trends in the long rains, which had partially recovered after a multidecadal drying trend in the 1980s through the 2000s. Despite observed drying, previous generations of global climate models (GCMs) have consistently projected long-term wetting due to increased greenhouse gas concentrations, an East African “paradox” which complicates the interpretation of East African rainfall projections. We investigate the paradox in new phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and seasonal forecast models, leveraging an improved observational record and large ensembles to better differentiate internal and forced trends. We find observed drying trends are at the limits of the GCM spread during the peak paradox period, though the recent recovery is comfortably within the model spread. We find that the apparent paradox is largely removed by prescribing sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and is likely caused by the GCM difficulties in simulating observed tropical Pacific SST trends in recent decades. In line with arguments that these SST trends are at least partially forced anthropogenically, we recommend users of future rainfall projections in East Africa consider the possibility of long-term MAM drying despite GCM wetting and call for future model simulations that better sample the expected spread of SSTs. Significance Statement Societies in the Horn of Africa depend on the March–May “long” rains and the September–December “short” rains to support agricultural and pastoral practices on rain-fed lands. Recent major droughts have raised worries about possible anthropogenically forced drying trends in the long rains through global climate models (GCMs) project wetting. This East African “paradox” complicates long-term climate adaptation planning. We find the paradox continues in the newest generation of GCMs and seasonal forecast models; though a recent recovery in rainfall is well-captured, the strongest observed drying trends are rare in simulations. The paradox likely arises from known GCM biases in the Pacific Ocean interacting with natural variability. We recommend that researchers and policymakers consider possible long-term drying despite GCM projections of wetting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Climate
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-24-0225.1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the “East African Paradox”: CMIP6 Models Also Struggle to Reproduce Strong Observed Long Rain Drying Trends

Richard Seager, Kevin Schwarzwald
3 citations
Journal of Climate
Climate variability and models
0.85
article

Revisiting the “East African Paradox”: CMIP6 Models Also Struggle to Reproduce Strong Observed Long Rain Drying Trends

Richard Seager, Kevin Schwarzwald
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Societies in much of the Horn of Africa are affected by variability in two distinct rainy seasons: the March–May (MAM) “long” rains and the October–December (OND) “short” rains. A recent five-season, La Niña–forced drought has renewed concerns about possible anthropogenic drying trends in the long rains, which had partially recovered after a multidecadal drying trend in the 1980s through the 2000s. Despite observed drying, previous generations of global climate models (GCMs) have consistently projected long-term wetting due to increased greenhouse gas concentrations, an East African “paradox” which complicates the interpretation of East African rainfall projections. We investigate the paradox in new phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and seasonal forecast models, leveraging an improved observational record and large ensembles to better differentiate internal and forced trends. We find observed drying trends are at the limits of the GCM spread during the peak paradox period, though the recent recovery is comfortably within the model spread. We find that the apparent paradox is largely removed by prescribing sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and is likely caused by the GCM difficulties in simulating observed tropical Pacific SST trends in recent decades. In line with arguments that these SST trends are at least partially forced anthropogenically, we recommend users of future rainfall projections in East Africa consider the possibility of long-term MAM drying despite GCM wetting and call for future model simulations that better sample the expected spread of SSTs. Significance Statement Societies in the Horn of Africa depend on the March–May “long” rains and the September–December “short” rains to support agricultural and pastoral practices on rain-fed lands. Recent major droughts have raised worries about possible anthropogenically forced drying trends in the long rains through global climate models (GCMs) project wetting. This East African “paradox” complicates long-term climate adaptation planning. We find the paradox continues in the newest generation of GCMs and seasonal forecast models; though a recent recovery in rainfall is well-captured, the strongest observed drying trends are rare in simulations. The paradox likely arises from known GCM biases in the Pacific Ocean interacting with natural variability. We recommend that researchers and policymakers consider possible long-term drying despite GCM projections of wetting.

Journal of ClimateVol. 37(24)
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US), Columbia University (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Climate variability and models
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.