Comparison of commercially available DNA and RNA extraction kits for wildlife feces collected from the environment

Wildlife fecal samples were collected across two Air Force installations to evaluate the effectiveness of commercially available DNA and RNA extraction kits. Four DNA kits, two DNA/RNA kits and one RNA only kit were used. Sample extracts were evaluated on nucleic acid concentration, TapeStation DNA or RNA Integrity Number values and presence of PCR inhibitors. For the DNA kits, PFP produced higher concentrations compared with PLM and RPM, while MWFM gave higher DNA Integrity Number values when compared with RPM. No PCR inhibition was detected. For the RNA kits, RPM gave higher concentrations compared with MWTV and no differences were seen in RNA Integrity Number values. PCR inhibition was observed in all RNA samples, with MWTV exhibiting higher inhibition compared with RPM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioTechniques
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07366205.2024.2397284
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of commercially available DNA and RNA extraction kits for wildlife feces collected from the environment

L. Colton, James D. Feller
2 citations
BioTechniques
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
0.92
article

Comparison of commercially available DNA and RNA extraction kits for wildlife feces collected from the environment

L. Colton, James D. Feller
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Wildlife fecal samples were collected across two Air Force installations to evaluate the effectiveness of commercially available DNA and RNA extraction kits. Four DNA kits, two DNA/RNA kits and one RNA only kit were used. Sample extracts were evaluated on nucleic acid concentration, TapeStation DNA or RNA Integrity Number values and presence of PCR inhibitors. For the DNA kits, PFP produced higher concentrations compared with PLM and RPM, while MWFM gave higher DNA Integrity Number values when compared with RPM. No PCR inhibition was detected. For the RNA kits, RPM gave higher concentrations compared with MWTV and no differences were seen in RNA Integrity Number values. PCR inhibition was observed in all RNA samples, with MWTV exhibiting higher inhibition compared with RPM.

BioTechniquesVol. 76(9)
US Forest Service (US), United States Air Force (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, U.S. Air Force
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of commercially available DNA and RNA extraction kits for wildlife feces collected from the environment — L. Colton, James D. Feller · BioTechniques (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS