Computational musicking: music + coding as a hybrid practice

While there is a growing body of research that explores the integration of music and coding in learning environments, much of this work has either emphasised the technical aspects of computer language design or music as a motivational context within which to learn computer science concepts. In this paper, we report on a study in which five undergraduate students with experience in both music and coding completed two creative musical tasks: one using conventional instruments and tools and one using Python code in an online music + coding environment. Inspired by the work of Christopher Small (1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. University Press of New England), we describe music + coding as a set of interlocking processes which we call computational musicking and explore how practices from both domains are reimagined in this new hybrid context. We introduce semiotic theories of translation and transcription to make sense of the computational musicking process and describe strategies that participants devised in their creative process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviour and Information Technology
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2024.2402533
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Music Technology and Sound Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational musicking: music + coding as a hybrid practice

Michael Horn, Cameron L. Roberts
6 citations
Behaviour and Information Technology
Music Technology and Sound Studies
1.50
article

Computational musicking: music + coding as a hybrid practice

Michael Horn, Cameron L. Roberts
article en
6 citations

Abstract

While there is a growing body of research that explores the integration of music and coding in learning environments, much of this work has either emphasised the technical aspects of computer language design or music as a motivational context within which to learn computer science concepts. In this paper, we report on a study in which five undergraduate students with experience in both music and coding completed two creative musical tasks: one using conventional instruments and tools and one using Python code in an online music + coding environment. Inspired by the work of Christopher Small (1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. University Press of New England), we describe music + coding as a set of interlocking processes which we call computational musicking and explore how practices from both domains are reimagined in this new hybrid context. We introduce semiotic theories of translation and transcription to make sense of the computational musicking process and describe strategies that participants devised in their creative process.

Behaviour and Information TechnologyVol. 44(5)
Northwestern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Music Technology and Sound Studies
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computational musicking: music + coding as a hybrid practice — Michael Horn, Cameron L. Roberts · Behaviour and Information Technology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS