REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH IN TRANS AND GENDER DIVERSE PATIENTS: Mind the gap: a nationwide audit of LGBTQ+ inclusion in fertility care providers in the United Kingdom
LGBTQ+ patients comprise one of the fastest-growing user demographics in fertility care, yet they remain under-represented in fertility research, practice, and discourse. Existing studies have revealed significant systemic barriers, including cisheteronormativity, discrimination, and gaps in clinical expertise. In this article, we present a checklist of measures that clinics can take to improve LGBTQ+ inclusion in fertility care, co-created with members of the LGBTQ+ community. This checklist focuses on three key areas: cultural competence, clinical considerations, and online presence. The cultural competence criteria encompass inclusive communication practices, a broad understanding of LGBTQ+ healthcare needs, and knowledge of treatment options suitable for LGBTQ+ individuals. Clinical considerations include awareness of alternative examination and gamete collection techniques for transgender and gender diverse patients, the existence of specific clinical pathways for LGBTQ+ patients, and sensitivity to the psychological aspects of fertility care unique to this demographic. The online presence criteria evaluate provider websites for the use of inclusive language and the availability of LGBTQ+-relevant information. The checklist was used as the foundation for an audit of fertility care providers across the UK in early 2024. Our audit identified a widespread lack of LGBTQ+ inclusion, particularly for transgender and gender diverse patients, highlighting deficiencies in clinical knowledge and cultural competence. Our work calls attention to the need for further efforts to understand the barriers to inclusive and competent LGBTQ+ fertility care from both healthcare provider and patient perspectives.
Authors
- Timothy Ferrand
- Ranya Derrick
- Francisco Herbert Lima Vasconcelos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4896-9024)
- Sotirios H. Saravelos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7079-6890)
- Danielle Ellis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-661X)
- Chloe He (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-5134)
- Cristina Hickman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0952-501X)
- Teodora Popa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-9549)
- Céline Jacques
- Neringa Karpavičiūtė
- Tash Oakes-Monger
- Luca Sabatini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-6842)
- Rishabh Hariharan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3230-006X)
- Devika Nair (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7164-715X)
- Sofia Tzouganatou
- Nour Al-ma'ani
- Isabella Marson
- Jules Sales
- Mei Francis
Institutions
- Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
- Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Guildford Hospital (GB)
- Learning Partnership (CA)
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health (GB)
- Wellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (GB)
- Amity University (AE)
- Agence Parisienne du Climat (FR)
- Virgin Care (GB)
- Institute for Reproductive Health (US)
- The Centre for Reproductive & Genetic Health
- University College London (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Defense Acquisition University (US)
- Nordson (United Kingdom) (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Reproduction
- Published
- 2024-09-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-24-0173
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.15