RESENHA DO ARTIGO PROPORCIONALIDADE E A EMENDA CONSTITUCIONAL 95/2016

The article "Proportionality and Constitutional Amendment 95/2016," authored by Cláudia Toledo, Camila Baeta, Isabel Nascimento, and Isabela Silveira, examines the new fiscal regime introduced by EC 95/2016 due to uncontrolled public finances and its impacts on fundamental rights. The authors argue that the amendment does not satisfy the principle of proportionality as outlined in Robert Alexy's theory of principles. They highlight that while some aspects of the amendment are adequate, it fails to meet the requirements of necessity and strict proportionality, adversely affecting basic rights such as health and education. Moreover, the authors criticize the legislator for not adequately assessing the impacts of budgetary restrictions, concluding that EC 95/2016 should be adjusted to minimize harm to fundamental rights and ensure a fairer balance between state actions and their effects on the population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista fisio&terapia.
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/ar10202409131035
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RESENHA DO ARTIGO PROPORCIONALIDADE E A EMENDA CONSTITUCIONAL 95/2016

Ernesto Ribeiro de Souza Lima Benetello
Revista fisio&terapia.
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

RESENHA DO ARTIGO PROPORCIONALIDADE E A EMENDA CONSTITUCIONAL 95/2016

Ernesto Ribeiro de Souza Lima Benetello
article en

Abstract

The article "Proportionality and Constitutional Amendment 95/2016," authored by Cláudia Toledo, Camila Baeta, Isabel Nascimento, and Isabela Silveira, examines the new fiscal regime introduced by EC 95/2016 due to uncontrolled public finances and its impacts on fundamental rights. The authors argue that the amendment does not satisfy the principle of proportionality as outlined in Robert Alexy's theory of principles. They highlight that while some aspects of the amendment are adequate, it fails to meet the requirements of necessity and strict proportionality, adversely affecting basic rights such as health and education. Moreover, the authors criticize the legislator for not adequately assessing the impacts of budgetary restrictions, concluding that EC 95/2016 should be adjusted to minimize harm to fundamental rights and ensure a fairer balance between state actions and their effects on the population.

Revista fisio&terapia.
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.