Greenhouse gas and volatile organic compound emissions of additive-treated whole-plant maize silage: part A—anaerobic fermentation period

Abstract Background Silage emits climate- and environment-relevant gases during fermentation and feed-out periods. This trial aimed to determine the unknown carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane, nitrous oxide, ethanol, and ethyl acetate emissions of constant maize silage material over both periods. The results will be published in two consecutive articles (Part A: anaerobic fermentation period, Part B: aerobic storage period). Methods The untreated control (CON) was compared with the chemical additive treatment (CHE; 0.5 g sodium benzoate and 0.3 g potassium sorbate per kg fresh matter) and the biological additive treatment (BIO; 10 8 colony-forming units (CFU) Lentilactobacillus buchneri and 10 7 CFU Lactiplantibacillus plantarum per kg fresh matter). Barrel silos ( n = 4) were connected to gas bags to quantify gas formation during anaerobic fermentation (30 or 135 ensiling days). Glass jar silos ( n = 12) were used for laboratory silage analysis. Results CHE produced significantly ( p < 0.05) less gas (6.7 ± 0.3 L per kg dry matter ensiled material (kg DM ) until ensiling day 14.0 ± 0.0) and ethanol (8.6 ± 1.5 mg kg DM –1 ) than CON did (8.5 ± 0.2 L kg DM –1 until ensiling day 19.5 ± 6.4; 12.2 ± 1.5 (mg ethanol) kg DM –1 ). BIO indicates prolonged gas formation (9.1 ± 0.9 L kg DM –1 until ensiling day 61.3 ± 51.9; 12.0 ± 2.1 mg kg DM –1 ). CO 2 is the main component of the gas formed. All treatments formed methane and nitrous oxide in small quantities. CON emitted significantly more CO 2 eq emissions than BIO and less than CHE ( p < 0.05). Additives had no effect on ethyl acetate gas emissions. For BIO, ethanol concentrations in the material ( r S = 0.609, p < 0.05) and gas quantities ( r S = 0.691, p < 0.05) correlate with ethyl acetate gas quantities. All the treatments exhibited decreasing gas and CO 2 quantities, and the dry matter mass increased between ensiling days 14 and 30 (− 0.810 ≤ r S ≤ 0.442; p < 0.05 to p = 0.20). Conclusion Silage generates climate- and environmental-relevant gases during fermentation and silage additives affect this pattern. Gas formation exceeds the fixation potential, and the carbon footprint of silage fermentation is negative. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-024-00655-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greenhouse gas and volatile organic compound emissions of additive-treated whole-plant maize silage: part A—anaerobic fermentation period

Manfred Trimborn, Wolfgang Büscher, Hauke F. Deeken, Kirsten Weiß et al.
3 citations
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.38
article

Greenhouse gas and volatile organic compound emissions of additive-treated whole-plant maize silage: part A—anaerobic fermentation period

Manfred Trimborn, Wolfgang Büscher, Hauke F. Deeken, Kirsten Weiß, Alexander J. Schmithausen, André Lipski, Gerd Maack
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Silage emits climate- and environment-relevant gases during fermentation and feed-out periods. This trial aimed to determine the unknown carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane, nitrous oxide, ethanol, and ethyl acetate emissions of constant maize silage material over both periods. The results will be published in two consecutive articles (Part A: anaerobic fermentation period, Part B: aerobic storage period). Methods The untreated control (CON) was compared with the chemical additive treatment (CHE; 0.5 g sodium benzoate and 0.3 g potassium sorbate per kg fresh matter) and the biological additive treatment (BIO; 10 8 colony-forming units (CFU) Lentilactobacillus buchneri and 10 7 CFU Lactiplantibacillus plantarum per kg fresh matter). Barrel silos ( n = 4) were connected to gas bags to quantify gas formation during anaerobic fermentation (30 or 135 ensiling days). Glass jar silos ( n = 12) were used for laboratory silage analysis. Results CHE produced significantly ( p < 0.05) less gas (6.7 ± 0.3 L per kg dry matter ensiled material (kg DM ) until ensiling day 14.0 ± 0.0) and ethanol (8.6 ± 1.5 mg kg DM –1 ) than CON did (8.5 ± 0.2 L kg DM –1 until ensiling day 19.5 ± 6.4; 12.2 ± 1.5 (mg ethanol) kg DM –1 ). BIO indicates prolonged gas formation (9.1 ± 0.9 L kg DM –1 until ensiling day 61.3 ± 51.9; 12.0 ± 2.1 mg kg DM –1 ). CO 2 is the main component of the gas formed. All treatments formed methane and nitrous oxide in small quantities. CON emitted significantly more CO 2 eq emissions than BIO and less than CHE ( p < 0.05). Additives had no effect on ethyl acetate gas emissions. For BIO, ethanol concentrations in the material ( r S = 0.609, p < 0.05) and gas quantities ( r S = 0.691, p < 0.05) correlate with ethyl acetate gas quantities. All the treatments exhibited decreasing gas and CO 2 quantities, and the dry matter mass increased between ensiling days 14 and 30 (− 0.810 ≤ r S ≤ 0.442; p < 0.05 to p = 0.20). Conclusion Silage generates climate- and environmental-relevant gases during fermentation and silage additives affect this pattern. Gas formation exceeds the fixation potential, and the carbon footprint of silage fermentation is negative. Graphical Abstract

Chemical and Biological Technologies in AgricultureVol. 11(1)
University of Bonn (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Federation of German Industries (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.